Rule 41.Dismissal of Actions.
Last amended May 11, 2017 · Last verified July 6, 2026
Full Text of Rule 41
Amendment History
(Adopted by SCO 5 October 9, 1959; amended by SCO 239 effective March 1, 1976; by SCO 258 effective November 15, 1976; by SCO 465 effective June 1, 1981; by SCO 798 effective March 15, 1987; by SCO 834 effective August 1, 1987; by SCO 1153 effective July 15, 1994; by SCO 1266 effective July 15, 1997; by SCO 1283 effective September 2, 1997; by SCO 1361 effective October 15, 1999; and by SCO 1908 effective nunc pro tunc May 11, 2017)
Notes
Note: Chapter 6, SLA 2017 (HB 104) repeals AS 09.68.130 and its requirements that the Alaska Judicial Council collect information about certain civil litigation from parties. Section 1 of the act repeals Civil Rule 41(a)(3) and Appellate Rule 511(c) and (e), effective May 11, 2017. Those rule provisions had required compliance with AS 09.68.130. This rule change is adopted for the sole reason that the legislature has mandated the amendment. The added revision to paragraph (a)(1) of Rule 41 is to eliminate its reference o the now rescinded paragraph (a)(3).
Plain-English Summary
A plaintiff can dismiss a case without a court order either by filing a notice of dismissal before the defendant answers or moves for summary judgment, or by filing a stipulation signed by every party who has appeared. That kind of dismissal is without prejudice unless it says otherwise, except that dismissing the same claim a second time counts as a decision on the merits, barring the plaintiff from bringing it a third time. Once a defendant has answered or moved for summary judgment, the plaintiff needs a court order to dismiss, and if the defendant has already filed a counterclaim, the court can't dismiss over the defendant's objection unless the counterclaim can still be resolved on its own; a court-ordered dismissal is also without prejudice unless the order says otherwise. If a plaintiff who once dismissed a case later refiles the same claim against the same defendant, the court can order the plaintiff to pay the costs of the earlier case and can pause the new one until that's done.
A defendant can move to dismiss a case the plaintiff isn't prosecuting or isn't handling according to the rules or a court order. In a bench trial, once the plaintiff rests its case, the defendant can move to dismiss on the ground that the plaintiff hasn't shown a right to relief, and the court — acting as the fact-finder — can weigh the evidence and rule against the plaintiff even if a bare-minimum case was made, or wait until all the evidence is in before deciding. Except for a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, or failure to join a necessary party, an involuntary dismissal counts as a decision on the merits unless the court's order says otherwise. These same dismissal rules apply to counterclaims, cross-claims, and third-party claims.
A case can also be dismissed for lack of prosecution if it's been pending more than a year with no proceedings taken, or more than a year without a trial or mandatory pretrial scheduling conference having been set or held. The clerk reviews pending cases twice a year, and for any case that qualifies, the court holds a calendar call or the clerk sends the parties a notice to show cause why the case shouldn't be dismissed. If no good cause is shown at the calendar call, or within 60 days after the notice goes out, the court dismisses the case — the clerk can do it directly if no one objects — without prejudice unless the order says otherwise. If that case gets refiled, the court can again order payment of the earlier case's costs and stay the new case until that's done.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a plaintiff drop a lawsuit without asking the court?
Yes, before the defendant answers or moves for summary judgment, or any time if every party who has appeared signs a stipulation; after that, dismissal needs a court order.
What happens if I dismiss the same claim twice?
The second dismissal of the same claim operates as a decision on the merits, which generally bars bringing that claim a third time.
Can my case get dismissed just for sitting inactive?
Yes — a case pending more than a year with no proceedings, or more than a year without a trial or required scheduling conference, can be dismissed for want of prosecution after a show-cause notice or calendar call.