Rule 61.Harmless Error.
Last verified July 6, 2026
Full Text of Rule 61
Amendment History
(Adopted by SCO 5 October 9, 1959)
Plain-English Summary
No mistake in admitting or excluding evidence, and no defect in any ruling, order, or anything a court or party did or failed to do, is by itself grounds for a new trial, for setting aside a verdict, or for vacating, modifying, or otherwise disturbing a judgment or order — unless refusing to act would be inconsistent with substantial justice. At every stage of a case, the court has to disregard any error or defect that doesn't affect the substantial rights of the parties, rather than let a technical misstep undo an otherwise sound result.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a trial error automatically get a verdict thrown out?
No — under the harmless error rule, an error is grounds for relief only if letting it stand would be inconsistent with substantial justice; the court must otherwise disregard errors that don't affect a party's substantial rights.
What kinds of errors does Rule 61 cover?
Any error in admitting or excluding evidence, and any defect in a ruling, order, or anything done or omitted by the court or a party.