Rule 26.3.Exchange of medical records and timing of expert disclosure in medical malpractice actions.
Last verified July 1, 2026
Full Text of Rule 26.3
Amendment History
Added by R-17-0010, effective July 1, 2018.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 26.3 speeds up a piece of discovery that comes up in nearly every medical malpractice case: the plaintiff's medical history. Within 5 days after a defendant answers or otherwise responds to the complaint, the plaintiff must serve copies of all available medical records relevant to the condition at issue, along with a signed authorization letting the defendant obtain the same records directly from the source. Within 10 days after that, each defendant must serve its own copies of the plaintiff's relevant medical records on the plaintiff and every other party. If a defendant later obtains additional records using the plaintiff's authorization, it must share any records that no one has produced yet with everyone else in the case, at its own expense. The parties can agree to narrow what records get exchanged under this rule.
The rule also levels the playing field on expert timing. Rather than letting one side disclose its standard-of-care and causation experts first and tailor a response, the parties must disclose the identities and opinions of those experts at the same time, unless they agree otherwise or the court orders a different sequence for good cause.
Frequently Asked Questions
How quickly must a medical malpractice plaintiff turn over medical records?
Within 5 days after a defendant answers or otherwise responds to the complaint, along with a records authorization.
When must a defendant produce the plaintiff’s medical records in return?
Within 10 days after the plaintiff serves its own records.
Why does Rule 26.3 require simultaneous expert disclosure?
So neither side can see the other’s standard-of-care or causation expert opinions before disclosing its own.
Can the parties agree to limit what records get exchanged?
Yes, by agreement.