Rule 3.1113.Memorandum
Division 11. Law and Motion · Chapter 2. Format of Motion Papers · Last amended 2017 · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3.1113
Plain-English Summary
Rule 3.1113 is the rule that decides how long, and how detailed, a motion brief can be. Every motion needs a supporting memorandum unless Rule 3.1114 says otherwise, and skipping one is risky: a court can treat a missing memorandum as an admission that the motion lacks merit and deny it on that basis alone. The memorandum itself has to lay out the facts, state the law concisely, and walk through the statutes, cases, and other authorities the party is relying on — and any case citation only needs the official report volume, page number, and year of decision, since courts cannot demand a different citation format.
Length limits do most of the real work in this rule. An opening or responding memorandum tops out at 15 pages, except for summary judgment or summary adjudication motions, which get 20; reply memoranda are capped at 10. None of those page counts include the caption page, notice of motion, exhibits, declarations, attachments, or the tables of contents and authorities. A party that needs more room can ask the court ex parte — with 24 hours’ written notice to the other side — and has to explain why the argument cannot fit within the limit. Any memorandum running past 10 pages needs a table of contents and table of authorities, and past 15 pages it also needs an opening summary of the argument; file an oversized memorandum without permission, and the court treats it like a late-filed paper.
The remaining subdivisions round out the mechanics: unpublished or hard-to-find authorities may need to be lodged with the court and shared with other parties on request; supporting papers should be attached to the notice of motion where practical; every reference to an exhibit or declaration needs to point to a specific page and, where relevant, paragraph or line; requests for judicial notice must be made in their own document under Rule 3.1306(c); and any proposed order gets lodged and served separately rather than attached to the moving papers, following the submission procedure in Rule 3.1312.
Advisory Committee Comment
The following comment is published by the Judicial Council of California alongside the rule itself — not commentary from this site.
See also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long can my summary judgment brief be?
Up to 20 pages for an opening or responding memorandum in a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion. Rule 3.1113(d) caps most other opening or responding memoranda at 15 pages and reply memoranda at 10.
What happens if I file a memorandum longer than the page limit?
Rule 3.1113(g) treats an oversized memorandum as a late-filed paper, meaning it gets filed and considered under whatever rules govern late filings rather than being rejected outright.
How do I get permission to file a longer memorandum?
Apply to the court ex parte, with written notice to the other parties at least 24 hours before the memorandum is due, and explain in the application why the argument cannot be made within the normal page limit.
What citation format does a California court require for cases?
Rule 3.1113(c) requires only the official report volume, page number, and year of decision. A court cannot insist on any other citation format.
Amendment History
Rule 3.1113 amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as rule 313 effective January 1, 1984; previously amended and renumbered as rule 3.1113 effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, July 1, 2000, January 1, 2003, January 1, 2004, January 1, 2008, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016.