Rule 3.1385.Duty to notify court and others of settlement of entire case
Division 12. Settlement · Last amended 2013 · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3.1385
Plain-English Summary
Courts and court-connected neutrals need to know right away when a case is over, so they stop spending time and resources on a dispute that no longer exists. Rule 3.1385 makes that notice mandatory: the moment an entire case settles or is otherwise resolved, the plaintiff or whichever party sought relief must file written notice with the court and serve it on every party and any arbitrator or ADR neutral involved, and must follow up with oral notice if a hearing or trial is scheduled within the next ten days. Waiting too long to tell an arbitrator about a settlement carries a real cost — the court can order the settling party to pay for the arbitrator’s scheduled time if notice comes fewer than two days before the hearing.
Notice is only the first step. Within 45 days of the settlement, the responsible party must also file a request to dismiss the case, and if that filing does not happen, the court dismisses the case on its own unless someone shows good cause not to. Some settlements cannot close that fast — money paid in installments, or conditions that take longer than 45 days to satisfy. For those, the rule lets the parties file a notice of conditional settlement specifying a later dismissal date, which pauses most hearings requiring a party’s appearance until close to that date, though hearings on sanctions or on a good faith settlement determination stay on calendar. A party who still cannot meet even that extended deadline can ask for more time by showing good cause before the deadline passes.
Two further safeguards apply. When a settlement involves a minor’s or a disabled person’s claim, the court cannot hold a dismissal-related order to show cause hearing until it has first approved the settlement itself, so the required court approval always comes before the case gets closed out. And under a separate statute, parties who settle and agree to dismiss under an enforceable settlement agreement still have to follow this rule’s notice and dismissal procedures — that statute permits the dismissal, but it does not excuse anyone from Rule 3.1385’s reporting requirements.
Advisory Committee Comment
The following comment is published by the Judicial Council of California alongside the rule itself — not commentary from this site.
Subdivisions (a) and (b). Amended Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 allows parties to settle a case and agree to have the case dismissed without prejudice. The plaintiff or other party seeking affirmative relief must follow the procedures outlined in subdivisions (a) and (b) even if the parties settle the case and agree to dismiss under the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6. Subdivision (c). Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 allows for but does not mandate the dismissal of cases with conditional settlements either upon stipulation of the parties or on the court’s own motion. Subdivision (c) provides an alternative process for cases with a conditional settlement in which dismissal is not sought under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
Frequently Asked Questions
How soon must a settled California civil case be dismissed?
Within 45 days of the settlement date. Rule 3.1385(b) requires the court to dismiss the case on its own if no request for dismissal is filed by then, unless good cause is shown.
What happens if a settlement cannot be finalized within 45 days?
The parties can file a notice of conditional settlement under Rule 3.1385(c) specifying a later dismissal date, which generally pauses hearings requiring a party’s appearance until close to that date, apart from sanctions hearings and good faith settlement determinations.
What happens if a party fails to notify an arbitrator of a settlement in time?
Under Rule 3.1385(a)(2), the court may order the party who failed to give at least two days’ notice to compensate the arbitrator or other ADR neutral for the scheduled hearing time, up to the amount the neutral would otherwise have earned.
Does settling a minor’s claim change the dismissal procedure?
Yes. Rule 3.1385(d) bars the court from holding an order to show cause hearing on dismissal until it has held a hearing approving the settlement, as long as the parties filed the papers needed to seek that approval.
Amendment History
Rule 3.1385 amended effective July 1, 2013; adopted as rule 225 effective January 1, 1985; previously amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 1989, January 1, 1992, July 1, 2001, July 1, 2002, January 1, 2004, January 1, 2006, and January 1, 2009.