§ 1029.8.Unlicensed Person Providing Goods Or Services For Which License Required
Title 14. Of Miscellaneous Provisions · Chapter 6. Of Costs · Last amended 2005 · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of § 1029.8
Plain-English Summary
This section penalizes people who cause harm while working outside the license the law requires for their trade -- contractors, certain professionals, and others covered by the specific licensing statutes it cross-references in the Business and Professions and Corporations Codes. An injured person can sue for treble the damages assessed, though subdivision (c) caps that extra amount at $10,000 beyond the actual damages.
Costs and fees follow the same discretionary pattern used elsewhere in this chapter: if the injured plaintiff prevails, the court may, in its discretion, award all costs and attorney's fees on top of the treble-damages recovery. Subdivision (b) makes clear this remedy doesn't replace or limit any other remedy the plaintiff might have, including a claim for exemplary damages.
Not everyone working without a current license falls within the statute's reach. Subdivision (d) excludes anyone who provided goods or services under a good-faith belief they were properly licensed and acting within scope, anyone whose license lapsed only for nonpayment of renewal fees but who remains eligible to renew without reapplying, and certain licensed nurses accused only of exceeding their scope of practice. Subdivision (e) also keeps this section out of unfair-competition actions brought under Business and Professions Code § 17000 by someone holding a closely related license.
Frequently Asked Questions
What damages can an injured plaintiff recover under Section 1029.8?
Treble the amount of damages assessed, with the additional damages above the actual loss capped at $10,000.
Can a prevailing plaintiff also recover costs and attorney's fees?
Yes, the court may, in its discretion, award all costs and attorney's fees to the injured person who prevails.
Does this section apply to someone who believed in good faith they were properly licensed?
No. Subdivision (d) excludes a person who provided goods or services under a good-faith belief of proper licensure and scope.
Does a lapsed license always trigger liability under this section?
Not if the license lapsed only for nonpayment of renewal fees and the person remains eligible to renew without reapplying for an original license.
Amendment History
Amended by Stats 2004 ch 575 (AB 2167),s 1, eff. 1/1/2005