§ 1281.6.Method of Appointing Arbitrator; Petition Made to Court to Appoint Neutral Arbitrator
Title 9. Arbitration · Chapter 2. Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements · Last amended 2002 · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 1281.6
Plain-English Summary
Picking an arbitrator starts with the agreement itself. If it spells out a method for appointing one, that method controls. If the agreement is silent, the parties who are seeking and resisting arbitration can agree on their own method instead. Only when neither the agreement nor the parties' own arrangement works -- because there's no agreed method, the method fails, or an appointed arbitrator stops acting and no successor has been named -- does the court step in in to appoint the arbitrator.
For a neutral arbitrator specifically, the court follows a defined process. It nominates five people, drawn from lists the parties jointly supply or from a governmental or private arbitration-focused organization. The parties then have five days after receiving those nominees to jointly select an arbitrator, and they aren't limited to the five names on the list -- they can agree on someone else entirely. Only if the parties can't agree within that five-day window does the court appoint the arbitrator from among its own nominees.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who selects the arbitrator in a California arbitration?
Whatever method the arbitration agreement itself specifies, if it has one; otherwise, a method the parties agree on, or, failing that, an arbitrator the court appoints.
What happens if the arbitration agreement doesn't say how to pick an arbitrator?
The parties seeking and resisting arbitration can agree on their own method; if they can't, the court appoints the arbitrator under § 1281.6.
How does the court's nomination process work for a neutral arbitrator?
The court nominates five candidates from lists the parties supply or from arbitration-focused organizations; the parties then have five days to jointly pick one (from the list or elsewhere), and the court appoints from its nominees only if they don't.
Amendment History
Amended by Stats 2001 ch 362 (SB 475), s 3, eff. 1/1/2002.