§ 271.Electronic transcripts; Provision of full text-searchable PDF copy if paper transcript delivered; Compliance with format requirements
Title 4. Ministerial Officers of Courts of Justice · Chapter 3. Phonographic Reporters · Enacted 2017 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of § 271
Plain-English Summary
§ 271 sets the default format for court transcripts: electronic, in the format the California Rules of Court specify. That default has three exceptions — the person entitled to the transcript can ask for paper instead, or, before January 1, 2023, the court or the reporter could document a genuine technical inability to handle an electronic transcript.
When a paper transcript is delivered under one of those exceptions, the reporter still owes a text-searchable PDF copy on request, within 120 days, if the proceedings were taken on computer-aided transcription equipment. That PDF copy is not itself treated as the original transcript — the paper copy keeps that status — but an electronic transcript delivered in the ordinary course under this section is treated as the original for every purpose, including an attorney’s duty to maintain or turn over a client file.
The section is deliberately vendor-neutral. A reporter is not required to use any particular software or technology to comply, absent an agreement with the court or the party, and rulemakers adopting format requirements must consider whether a range of vendors can meet them. Reporters also get at least a year to adapt to any new format requirement adopted after January 1, 2023, unless a security issue calls for faster action.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a party still get a paper court transcript in California?
Yes. § 271(a)(1) lets the person entitled to the transcript request the paper form instead of the electronic default.
If I get a paper transcript, can I still get a searchable PDF version?
Yes, if the proceedings were taken on computer-aided equipment. § 271(b) requires the reporter to provide a text-searchable PDF copy on request within 120 days, though that copy is not treated as the original transcript.
Is an electronic transcript as legally valid as a paper one?
Yes. § 271(d) treats an electronic transcript delivered under this section as an original transcript for all purposes, except where a paper copy was substituted under subdivision (b).
Can a court require reporters to use one specific transcript software?
Not without agreement. § 271(e) lets reporters choose their own vendor and technology absent an agreement otherwise, and requires format rules to be adopted on a technology-neutral basis.
Amendment History
Added Stats 2017 ch 532 § 2 (AB 1450), effective January 1, 2018.