Section 1-11A.Media Coverage of Arraignments
Current through August 12, 2025 (2026 Practice Book edition) · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Section 1-11A
Amendment History
(Adopted June 29, 2007, to take effect Jan. 1, 2008; amended June 20, 2011, to take effect Jan. 1, 2012; amended June 10, 2022, to take effect Jan. 1, 2023.)
Plain-English Summary
This section lets the judicial authority presiding over an arraignment authorize broadcasting, televising, recording, or photographing of that proceeding. A media representative who wants coverage must email a request to a person the chief court administrator designates for that purpose. That designee forwards the request to the administrative judge, the presiding judge of criminal matters, the arraignment judge, the clerk, and the supervising marshal, and the administrative judge ensures the state's attorney and the defendant's attorney (or the defendant, if unrepresented) get notice. Coverage can't proceed until those parties have had a chance to object on the record and the judicial authority has ruled. If a request is denied, or granted over an objection, the judicial authority must state the reasons for the decision, and that decision is final.
Several things stay off-limits regardless of what's authorized: any defendant not covered by the coverage order and, where practicable, anyone else besides court personnel and permitted participants; bench conferences and attorney-client communications; close-ups of documents belonging to counsel, the clerk, or the judicial authority; the defendant entering or exiting the lockup; restraints on the defendant, where practicable; marshals or Department of Correction employees escorting the defendant, where practicable; and proceedings involving a case transferred from juvenile court before the adult court has determined the transfer was proper.
Equipment is tightly limited: one still camera, one television camera, and one audio recorder, none producing distracting sound or light, unless the judicial authority orders otherwise. No supplemental artificial lighting is allowed. All personnel and equipment must stay unobtrusive, in a location the judicial authority sets, and a camera operator can't move from the assigned spot once the arraignment starts. Videographers and photographers must behave quietly and with regard for courtroom dignity.
When more than one media outlet wants to cover the same arraignment, they must arrange pooling among themselves — the judicial authority won't referee those disputes. And any on-camera reporting or interviews must happen outside the courthouse, not inside it.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does media request permission to cover a Connecticut arraignment?
By emailing a request for electronic coverage to a person the chief court administrator designates, who then routes it to the administrative judge, arraignment judge, clerk, and supervising marshal for notice and possible objection.
Who can object to camera coverage of an arraignment?
The state’s attorney and the defendant’s attorney, or the defendant personally if unrepresented, may object on the record before the judicial authority rules on the request.
How much camera equipment is allowed at an arraignment?
Only one still camera, one television camera, and one audio recording device, none producing distracting sound or light, unless the judicial authority orders otherwise.
Can cameras show a defendant in restraints or being escorted by marshals?
No, to the extent practicable — the rule bars coverage of restraints on the defendant and of marshals or Department of Correction employees escorting the defendant in the courtroom.
Can reporters interview people inside the courthouse after an arraignment?
No. On-camera reporting and interviews are only allowed outside the courthouse.