Section 13-31.—Use of Depositions in Court Proceedings
Current through August 12, 2025 (2026 Practice Book edition) · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Section 13-31
Amendment History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 248; amended June 12, 2025, to take effect Jan. 1, 2026.) HISTORY—2026: Prior to 2026, the title of subsection (a) read: ‘‘Use of Depositions.’’ Additionally, what is now subsection (b) was added, what had been subsections (b) and (c) were redesignated as subsections (c) and (d), respectively, and in what is now subsection (c), the reference to what is now subsection (d) was updated.
Rules Committee Commentary
Plain-English Summary
Section 13-31 covers use of depositions in Connecticut proceedings. At trial, a probate proceeding, an administrative appeal, or a hearing on a motion or interlocutory matter, a deposition (to the extent it would be admissible under the rules of evidence) may be used against a party who was present, represented, or had reasonable notice of the deposition. Any deposition may be used to contradict or impeach a witness. A deposition of a physician, psychologist, chiropractor, naturopathic physician, osteopathic physician, or dentist may be received in place of live testimony whether or not that witness is available to testify in person. The deposition of a party, or of an officer, director, managing agent, or employee testifying on behalf of a corporate or governmental party, may be used by an adverse party for any purpose. The deposition of any other witness may be used for any purpose if the court finds the witness is dead, more than thirty miles from the trial or out of state and not returning in time, unable to attend due to age, illness, infirmity, or imprisonment, unable to be subpoenaed by the offering party, or if the parties agreed to such use, or exceptional circumstances make it desirable in the interest of justice. If only part of a deposition is offered, an adverse party may require the introduction of any other part that fairness requires, and depositions taken in a dismissed action may be used in a later action between the same parties on the same subject matter.
Depositions of Connecticut residents may also be taken for use in out-of-state or federal proceedings. Objections to admitting a deposition at trial may generally be raised at the trial or hearing, but the section also sets waiver rules for specific defects: objections to notice errors are waived unless promptly raised in writing; objections to the officer’s disqualification are waived unless raised before or as soon as the disqualification is discovered; objections to witness competency or testimony relevance are not waived by silence during the deposition unless the defect could have been fixed at the time; other errors in how the deposition was taken are waived unless raised at the deposition itself; and errors in how the transcript was prepared, signed, certified, or filed are waived unless a motion to suppress is made promptly after the defect is or should have been discovered.
Frequently Asked Questions
When can a deposition be used at trial in Connecticut?
It may be used against a party who was present, represented, or had reasonable notice of the deposition, to the extent it would be admissible if the witness were testifying live, and it can always be used to contradict or impeach a witness.
Can a doctor’s deposition replace live testimony?
Yes. The deposition of a physician, psychologist, chiropractor, naturopathic physician, osteopathic physician, or dentist may be used in place of that witness’s live appearance whether or not the witness is available to testify in person.
When can a witness’s deposition be used even though the witness is not a party?
The court must find the witness is dead, more than thirty miles from trial or out of state and not returning in time, unable to attend due to age, illness, infirmity, or imprisonment, that the offering party could not procure attendance by subpoena, that the parties agreed to the use, or that exceptional circumstances make use desirable in the interest of justice.
Do you waive an objection to a deposition by not raising it during the deposition?
It depends on the type of defect: objections to notice, the officer’s disqualification, and errors that could have been fixed at the time must be raised promptly or during the deposition, while objections to a witness’s competency or testimony’s relevance are not waived by silence unless the defect could have been corrected then.
COMMENTARY—2026: The changes to this section have been made in response to the adoption of the Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act, now codified at General Statutes § 52-655 et seq. The change to subsection (a) makes it clear that the subsection refers to the use of depositions in in-state proceedings. Subsection (b), which is a slight modification of former Section 13-28 (g) (1), applies to depositions taken in this state for out-of-state proceedings.