Section 2-39.Reciprocal Discipline
Current through August 12, 2025 (2026 Practice Book edition) · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Section 2-39
Amendment History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 28A.) (Amended June 29, 1998, to take effect Sept. 1, 1998; amended August 24, 2001, to take effect Jan. 1, 2002; amended June 24, 2002, to take effect July 1, 2003; May 14, 2003, effective date changed to Oct. 1, 2003; Sept. 30, 2003, effective date changed to Jan. 1, 2004; amended June 11, 2021, to take effect Jan. 1, 2022.)
Plain-English Summary
When a lawyer admitted in Connecticut is disbarred, suspended, resigned under disciplinary pressure, or placed on inactive disability status in another jurisdiction, the disciplinary counsel files a certified copy of that order with the Superior Court here. Filing goes to the judicial district where the lawyer keeps a law office, or to Hartford if the lawyer has none. No filing fee applies.
The court then serves the lawyer with the other jurisdiction's order and a directive to answer within thirty days, either admitting or denying what happened and explaining why matching discipline shouldn't follow. The certified copy stands as prima facie evidence that the other order was entered and that its findings are true.
Once that thirty-day window closes, the court holds a hearing and imposes commensurate discipline — unless the lawyer proves, by clear and convincing evidence, one of five things: the original proceeding denied due process, the proof behind it was too weak to trust, the discipline would work a grave injustice, the underlying conduct calls for substantially different discipline here, or the reason for an inactive-disability placement no longer exists. The rule also excuses a reciprocal filing altogether if Connecticut's own court or Statewide Grievance Committee already gave the same conduct a formal review.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Connecticut automatically discipline a lawyer disciplined elsewhere?
Not automatically in the sense of skipping review — the court still serves the lawyer, allows a thirty-day answer, and holds a hearing. But absent one of five specific defenses proven by clear and convincing evidence, the court imposes commensurate discipline.
What can a lawyer argue to avoid reciprocal discipline in Connecticut?
The lawyer can show the original proceeding lacked due process, the proof was too weak to accept, the discipline would cause grave injustice, Connecticut law calls for substantially different discipline, or the basis for an inactive-disability status no longer applies.
Is there a filing fee for a reciprocal discipline proceeding?
No. Section 2-39 (a) states no entry fee is required for these proceedings.
Where does the disciplinary counsel file the out-of-state order?
In the judicial district where the lawyer maintains a Connecticut law office, or in the judicial district of Hartford if the lawyer has no such office.