Rule 32.Use of depositions in court proceedings
Part V: Depositions and Discovery · Last amended January 1, 1995 · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of Rule 32
Amendment History
Amended, effective July 1, 1970; June 1, 1981; Jan. 1, 1991; Jan. 1, 1995.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 32(a) lets a deposition be used against a party who was present or represented at the taking, or who had reasonable notice of it, so far as the testimony would be admissible if the witness were present and testifying. Any deposition can be used by any party to contradict or impeach a witness, or for other purposes the Delaware Uniform Rules of Evidence permit, and the deposition of a party, or of someone who was an officer, director, or managing agent, or a designated witness under Rule 30(b)(6) or 31(a), can be used against that party for any purpose by an adverse party.
Rule 32(a)(3) opens the door wider for any witness, party or not, once the court finds one of several things: the witness has died; is out of Delaware, unless the offering party procured that absence; can't attend or testify because of age, illness, infirmity, or imprisonment; can't be reached by subpoena; or exceptional circumstances make using the deposition desirable in the interest of justice. Two limits protect a party who's caught off guard: a deposition taken under a Rule 30(b)(2) special notice can't be used against a party who couldn't get counsel in time despite diligence, and a deposition can't be used against a party who got less than 11 days' notice and promptly moved for a protective order that's still pending when the deposition happens.
Rule 32(a)(4) lets an adverse party require that any other part of a partially offered deposition that in fairness belongs with it also come in, and depositions taken and filed in an earlier action can be reused in a later action between the same parties or their successors over the same subject matter. Rule 32(d) sets waiver rules for errors and irregularities: objections to notice, to the officer's qualifications, to how the examination was conducted, or to the form of written questions under Rule 31 are all waived unless raised promptly, with a 5-day deadline for objecting to the form of written questions after the last authorized round. Errors in how the deposition was transcribed, signed, certified, or filed are waived unless a motion to suppress follows promptly after the defect comes to light.
Rule 32(e) lets a party offer deposition testimony in stenographic or nonstenographic form, but if it's nonstenographic, the party also has to give the court a transcript of the portions being offered.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use a deposition transcript to impeach a witness at trial?
Yes. Rule 32(a)(1) allows any deposition to be used by any party to contradict or impeach the testimony of a deponent as a witness, or for other purposes the Delaware Uniform Rules of Evidence allow.
Can I use a witness's deposition even if that witness doesn't show up for trial?
Yes, if the court finds the witness has died, is out of Delaware, can't attend because of age, illness, infirmity, or imprisonment, can't be reached by subpoena, or if exceptional circumstances make using the deposition desirable in the interest of justice.
Is there a deadline for objecting to how a deposition was taken?
Yes, and it varies by the type of error. Rule 32(d) requires objections to be raised promptly for most defects, with a specific 5-day deadline for objecting to the form of written questions after the last authorized round is served.
If I only offer part of a deposition into evidence, can the other side make me introduce more of it?
Yes. Rule 32(a)(4) lets an adverse party require the offering party to introduce any other part of the deposition that ought in fairness to be considered alongside the part already introduced.
Can I offer a video deposition instead of a written transcript?
Yes, but Rule 32(e) requires that if you offer the testimony in nonstenographic form, you must also give the court a transcript of the portions you're offering.