Rule 13.Counterclaim and Crossclaim
Last amended December 1, 2009 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 13
Amendment History
(Amended December 27, 1946, effective March 19, 1948; January 21, 1963, effective July 1, 1963; February 28, 1966, effective July 1, 1966; March 2, 1987, effective August 1, 1987; April 30, 2007, effective December 1, 2007; March 26, 2009, effective December 1, 2009.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 13 keeps related disputes in one case. A counterclaim is a claim back against an opposing party. It is compulsory — and must be raised in the pending action or forfeited — if it arises out of the same transaction or occurrence as the opposing party’s claim and does not require adding a party over whom the court lacks jurisdiction. Any other counterclaim is permissive: a party may raise it but need not.
The rule also allows a crossclaim against a co-party if it arises out of the same transaction or occurrence as the original action or relates to property at issue. Counterclaims and crossclaims let the court resolve the whole controversy together rather than in piecemeal suits.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a compulsory counterclaim?
A claim against an opposing party that arises from the same transaction or occurrence as that party’s claim; it must be pleaded in the same action or it is generally lost (Rule 13(a)).
What is a crossclaim?
A claim against a co-party — for example, one defendant against another — arising out of the same transaction or occurrence as the original action (Rule 13(g)).