Rule 22.Interpleader
Last amended December 1, 2007 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 22
Amendment History
(Amended December 29, 1948, effective October 20, 1949; March 2, 1987, effective August 1, 1987; April 30, 2007, effective December 1, 2007.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 22 solves the problem of the stakeholder caught in the middle. When several people claim the same fund or property — say an insurer facing rival claims to one policy — the holder risks paying twice or facing inconsistent judgments. Interpleader lets that holder bring all the claimants into a single case so the court can sort out who gets what.
A plaintiff may seek interpleader even while denying any liability to any claimant, and a defendant may obtain it through a counterclaim or crossclaim. Rule 22 interpleader rests on the ordinary jurisdiction rules; it operates alongside, and does not replace, the separate statutory interpleader available under federal law.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is interpleader?
A procedure that lets someone holding money or property claimed by several people join all the claimants in one suit so the court can decide who is entitled to it, avoiding double liability (Rule 22).
Does the stakeholder have to admit it owes something to use interpleader?
No. A plaintiff may seek interpleader under Rule 22 even while denying liability to any of the claimants — the point is to let the court sort out entitlement, not to concede the debt.