Rule 23.1.Derivative Actions
Last amended December 1, 2007 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 23.1
Amendment History
(Adopted February 28, 1966, effective July 1, 1966; amended March 2, 1987, effective August 1, 1987; April 30, 2007, effective December 1, 2007.)
Plain-English Summary
A derivative action is a suit by a shareholder or member that asserts the corporation’s right, usually against insiders the company itself will not sue. Because the plaintiff is standing in the company’s shoes, Rule 23.1 adds safeguards. The complaint must be verified, and it must show that the plaintiff was a shareholder or member at the time of the challenged transaction and that the action is not a collusive attempt to manufacture federal jurisdiction.
Critically, the complaint must state with particularity any effort the plaintiff made to get the directors (and, if necessary, the shareholders) to pursue the claim, or the reasons for not making that effort — the demand requirement. A derivative action may be settled, voluntarily dismissed, or compromised only with the court’s approval, with notice to affected shareholders as the court orders.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a shareholder derivative action?
A suit in which a shareholder enforces a right belonging to the corporation, typically because the company itself will not bring the claim (Rule 23.1).
What is the demand requirement?
Rule 23.1 requires the complaint to state with particularity the plaintiff’s effort to get the directors to act on the claim, or the reasons why such a demand was excused.