Rule 35.Physical and Mental Examinations
Last amended December 1, 2007 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 35
Amendment History
(Amended March 30, 1970, effective July 1, 1970; March 2, 1987, effective August 1, 1987; amended by Pub.L. 100-690, Title VII, § 7047(b), November 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4401; amended April 30, 1991, effective December 1, 1991; April 30, 2007, effective December 1, 2007.)
Plain-English Summary
When a person’s physical or mental condition is squarely in dispute — for example, a plaintiff claiming a disabling injury — Rule 35 lets the other side test that claim. Unlike most discovery, it requires a court order: a party must move for the examination, give notice, and show good cause, and the condition must be in controversy.
The order names a suitably licensed or certified examiner and specifies the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the examination. The party who was examined may request a copy of the examiner’s written report; doing so, however, generally obligates that party to turn over reports of any other examinations of the same condition, and can waive certain protections as to that condition.
Frequently Asked Questions
When can a court order a physical or mental examination?
On a party’s motion, for good cause, when the person’s physical or mental condition is in controversy (Rule 35(a)).
Who performs a Rule 35 examination?
A suitably licensed or certified examiner named in the court’s order, which also sets the time, place, scope, and conditions of the exam.