Rule 44.1.Determining Foreign Law
Last amended December 1, 2007 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 44.1
Amendment History
(Adopted February 28, 1966, effective July 1, 1966; amended November 20, 1972, effective July 1, 1975; March 2, 1987, effective August 1, 1987; April 30, 2007, effective December 1, 2007.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 44.1 changed how courts handle foreign law. A party who intends to raise an issue about a foreign country’s law must give notice, by a pleading or other writing, so the issue is not a surprise.
In deciding the issue, the court is not limited to what the parties submit or to ordinary evidence: it may consider any relevant material or source, including testimony, whether or not it would be admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence. The court’s determination is treated as a ruling on a question of law — made by the judge rather than the jury, and reviewable on appeal as a legal question.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does a court determine foreign law under Rule 44.1?
The party gives notice of the issue, and the court may consider any relevant material or source — even one not admissible under the evidence rules — deciding it as a question of law.
Is a foreign-law determination reviewed as a fact finding or a legal ruling on appeal?
As a legal ruling. Rule 44.1 treats the court's determination of foreign law as a ruling on a question of law, made by the judge rather than the jury, and reviewed accordingly on appeal.