Rule 65.1.Proceedings Against a Security Provider
Last amended December 1, 2018 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 65.1
Amendment History
(Adopted February 28, 1966, effective July 1, 1966; amended March 2, 1987, effective August 1, 1987; April 12, 2006, effective December 1, 2006; April 30, 2007, effective December 1, 2007; April 26, 2018, effective December 1, 2018.)
Plain-English Summary
When the rules require a party to post security — an injunction bond, a supersedeas bond on appeal, or similar — someone has to back it. Rule 65.1 makes that backer easy to hold to its promise. Whenever a party gives security with one or more security providers (the rule’s broadened term, which replaced “surety” in 2018), each provider submits to the court’s jurisdiction and irrevocably appoints the court clerk as its agent for receiving any papers that affect its liability.
The payoff is procedural economy: the provider’s liability may be enforced on motion in the same case, without starting an independent action. The party seeking to enforce serves the motion on the clerk, who mails a copy to each security provider whose address is known. The bond is collected within the case that created it.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a security provider under Rule 65.1?
A party — such as a surety or bonding company — that posts a bond or other security in a case. By doing so, it submits to the court’s jurisdiction (Rule 65.1).
How is a bond enforced under Rule 65.1?
By motion in the same action, not a separate lawsuit; the motion is served on the clerk, who mails copies to the security providers.