Rule 82.Jurisdiction and Venue Unaffected
Last amended December 1, 2016 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 82
Amendment History
(Amended December 29, 1948, effective October 20, 1949; February 28, 1966, effective July 1, 1966; April 23, 2001, effective December 1, 2001; April 30, 2007, effective December 1, 2007; April 28, 2016, effective December 1, 2016.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 82 is a one-paragraph guardrail. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are about how cases proceed, not about which court has power to hear them or where they may be brought. The rule states that the rules do not extend or limit the jurisdiction of the district courts, which comes from the Constitution and statutes, and do not change the statutory venue of actions.
It also coordinates with admiralty practice, clarifying how an admiralty or maritime claim under Rule 9(h) is treated for venue purposes. The takeaway: when a question is about jurisdiction or venue, the answer comes from the governing statutes, not from these procedural rules.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do the Federal Rules change a court’s jurisdiction or venue?
No. Rule 82 provides that the rules do not extend or limit the district courts’ jurisdiction or the venue of actions — those are governed by statute.
Does Rule 82 say anything about admiralty claims?
Yes. It clarifies how an admiralty or maritime claim under Rule 9(h) is treated for venue purposes, coordinating with admiralty practice rather than changing the underlying venue statutes.