Rule B.In Personam Actions: Attachment and Garnishment
Last amended December 1, 2009 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule B
Amendment History
(Added Feb. 28, 1966, eff. July 1, 1966; amended Apr. 29, 1985, eff. Aug. 1, 1985; Mar. 2, 1987, eff. Aug. 1, 1987; Apr. 17, 2000, eff. Dec. 1, 2000; Apr. 25, 2005, eff. Dec. 1, 2005; Mar. 26, 2009, eff. Dec. 1, 2009.)
Plain-English Summary
Supplemental Rule B solves a problem unique to maritime commerce: a defendant — often a foreign shipowner — whose only presence in the district is property that can quickly sail away. When the defendant is not found within the district, the plaintiff in an in personam admiralty claim may, with a verified complaint and the court’s review of the papers, have the defendant’s tangible or intangible property in the district attached or garnished up to the amount of the claim.
The attachment serves two purposes at once: it secures the eventual judgment and it establishes a basis for the court to proceed against an absent defendant. The rule builds in safeguards — judicial scrutiny before issuance and a prompt opportunity for the defendant or anyone with an interest to be heard and seek release under the general provisions of Supplemental Rule E. There is a fast track around that judicial scrutiny, though: if the plaintiff or the plaintiff's attorney certifies that exigent circumstances make court review impracticable, the clerk must issue the attachment process immediately, and the plaintiff then bears the burden at a post-attachment hearing to show those exigent circumstances existed.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is maritime attachment under Rule B?
A procedure that lets a plaintiff in an in personam admiralty case attach a defendant’s property in the district — up to the amount claimed — when the defendant cannot be found there (Supplemental Rule B).
Does a judge always review the attachment before it issues?
Not always. If the plaintiff or the plaintiff's attorney certifies that exigent circumstances make court review impracticable, the clerk must issue the attachment immediately without prior judicial review — but the plaintiff then has the burden, at any post-attachment hearing, to show those circumstances were real.