Rule 61.Harmless Error.
Last verified July 3, 2026
Full Text of Rule 61
Plain-English Summary
No error in admitting or excluding evidence, and no error or defect in any ruling, order, or anything done or left undone by the court or the parties, is grounds for a new trial, setting aside a verdict, or disturbing a judgment or order, unless refusing to act on it would be inconsistent with substantial justice.
At every stage of a case, the court has to look past any error or defect that doesn't affect the parties' substantial rights, keeping the focus on outcomes that matter rather than technical missteps along the way.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does every trial error require a new trial or reversal?
No. Rule 61 requires disregarding errors that don't affect the parties' substantial rights, and reserves relief for situations where ignoring the error would be inconsistent with substantial justice.
What kinds of errors does this rule cover?
Any error in admitting or excluding evidence, and any error or defect in a ruling, order, or anything done or omitted by the court or the parties.