Rule 37.1.Mediation of civil cases
Title VI: Alternative Dispute Resolution and Trial · Last amended March 28, 2025 · Last verified July 14, 2026
Full Text of Rule 37.1
Amendment History
(Adopted March 1, 2016, effective July 1, 2016; amended September 9, 2016, effective September 9, 2016; amended June 24, 2021, effective July 1, 2021; amended March 28, 2025, effective March 28, 2025.)
Plain-English Summary
Mediation, as Rule 37.1 defines it, puts a neutral mediator in the room to help the parties talk through a dispute, surface the real issues, and find common ground — but any agreement that comes out of it belongs to the parties, not the mediator. Any civil case can be referred, and sending a case to mediation doesn't take the court out of the picture; the judge keeps full authority to manage the case while mediation is underway. Referral can come from a party's motion, from a Rule 16 conference, from a joint request when the parties ask for a trial setting, or from the court's own initiative, so long as the parties get seven days' notice in that last situation.
Once a case is referred, the parties get 28 days to agree on a mediator; if they don't, the court appoints one from the judicial district's roster. The first session then has to happen within 42 days of the mediator being selected or appointed, unless the court says otherwise. Within seven days after the last session, the mediator or the parties have to tell the court whether the case settled, in whole or in part, copying everyone on that communication. Mediators get paid their regular fees, shared proportionally among the parties unless they arrange something else or the court orders otherwise, and an unpaid mediator can ask the court to order payment. The mediator owes the parties impartiality, including an ongoing duty to flag anything that could look like bias or favoritism. Attendance is mandatory for the attorneys handling the case and for the parties or their insurers who hold settlement authority, though the court can excuse someone for good cause, on the parties' joint request or the mediator's own request. Whatever confidentiality rules the parties agree to govern the mediator's conduct, and the Idaho Rules of Evidence protecting settlement talks and mediation communications apply on top of that. A mediator who doesn't live up to these responsibilities risks sanctions, up to and including removal from the list of approved mediators.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a court force a civil case into mediation even if a party would rather not?
Yes. Rule 37.1(d) lets the court order any civil case into mediation on its own initiative, in addition to referral by motion or at a Rule 16 conference, though a court-initiated referral requires giving the parties seven days' notice.
Who picks the mediator?
The parties do, within 28 days of the mediation order, unless the court says otherwise. If they can't agree or don't report a selection in time, the court appoints a mediator from the judicial district's list.
Who has to show up at the mediation session?
The attorneys primarily responsible for trying the case, along with the parties themselves, or their insurers where applicable, who hold authority to settle. Attendance can be excused by the court on its own initiative, at the joint request of parties who show good cause, or at the mediator's request for good cause.
Is what happens during mediation confidential?
Yes. The mediator has to follow whatever confidentiality rules the parties agree to, and the confidentiality protections in Rules 408 and 507 of the Idaho Rules of Evidence apply to mediation communications on top of that.
Can a mediator face consequences for not doing the job properly?
Yes. A mediator who fails to fulfill the responsibilities Rule 37.1 lays out can be sanctioned, including being removed from the roster of approved mediators.