9-106.3.Affirmative defenses for retaliation on the basis of immigration status.
Article IX. Eviction · Part 1. In General · Last amended 2019 · Last verified July 20, 2026
Full Text of 735 ILCS 5/9-106.3
Plain-English Summary
Two grounds support the defense: a demand based solely or partly on citizenship or immigration status, or a demand based solely or partly on a failure to provide a Social Security number, information needed for a consumer credit report, or an acceptable form of identification, once the lease has commenced and the tenant has already taken possession.
The section leaves a good deal untouched. A landlord can still comply with legal obligations, including rent-limitation or rental-assistance programs and a subpoena, warrant, or other court order; can still request documentation to verify a prospective tenant's financial qualifications before move-in; can still deliver notice about lease or rule violations; and the section neither expands nor shrinks a landlord's other legal grounds for ending a tenancy, nor a local government's power to regulate landlord harassment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a landlord evict a tenant because of their immigration status?
No -- a demand for possession based solely or partly on citizenship or immigration status is an affirmative defense to eviction.
Can a tenant be evicted for not providing a Social Security number?
Not once the lease has started and the tenant has moved in -- a demand based on that failure is likewise an affirmative defense, though the section doesn't reach ordinary pre-lease screening.
Does this section stop a landlord from checking a tenant's finances before signing a lease?
No, a landlord may still request information or documentation to verify a prospective tenant's financial qualifications.
Does this section limit a landlord's ability to enforce lease rules?
No, a landlord can still deliver oral or written notice about tenant conduct that violates the lease or the law.
Does this section stop a landlord from complying with a subpoena or court order?
No, subsection (b) preserves compliance with legal obligations, including a subpoena, warrant, or other court order.
Amendment History
(Source: P.A. 101-439, eff. 8-21-19.)