Rule 572.Form of Charging Document.
Article V. Rules on Trial Court Proceedings in Traffic and Conservation Offenses, Ordinance Offenses, Petty Offenses, Misdemeanors, and Civil Law Violations · Part E. Rules and Procedures for Non-Traffic/Non-Conservation Ordinance Violations · Last amended 2025 · Last verified July 20, 2026
In one sentenceRule 572 sets the minimum content and signature requirements for whatever document — ticket, notice to appear, or formal complaint — starts an ordinance prosecution.
Full Text of Ill. S. Ct. R. 572
(a) A prosecution for an ordinance violation for which the penalty does not include the possibility of a jail term may be initiated by a charging document such as a Notice to Appear, Uniform Citation and Complaint Form, Ticket, or Complaint that meets the requirements set forth in Rules 10 and 552. If initiated by uniform citation approved by the Conference of Chief Circuit Judges, the uniform citation shall be signed by the peace officer or a code enforcement officer authorized by the plaintiff to sign the charging document, which shall be processed as provided in Rule 552. Any other form of charging document shall be signed by the prosecuting attorney and be verified as provided in section 1-109 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/1-109). Such charging document or combination of documents shall contain at least the following:
1. The name of the prosecuting entity;
2. The name of the defendant and his or her address, if known;
3. The nature of the offense and a reference to the relevant ordinance;
4. A statement the defendant is required to appear in court and the date, time and place of appearance;
5. The steps the defendant can take to avoid an otherwise required appearance; and
6. A statement that the defendant may demand a jury trial by filing a jury demand and paying a jury demand fee when entering his or her appearance, plea, answer to the charge, or other responsive pleading.
(b) The following statement(s) shall also appear on the charging document or combination of documents listed in (a) above in the event a warrant or default judgment will be sought by the prosecuting entity:
1. A statement that a default judgment may be entered in the event the person fails to appear in court or answer the charge made on the date set for the defendant’s court appearance or any date to which the case is continued. The statement must also contain the specific amount of any default judgment.
2. A statement that an arrest warrant may issue if the defendant fails to appear at any hearing.
(c) Multiple Violations. Multiple violations of automobile parking offenses may be contained in a single count. Violations of the same offense occurring on different days, or violations of ordinances which carry a per day fine, may be stated in one count even though each violation or day upon which a violation occurs carries a separate fine. Such separate violations and fines must be clearly stated.
(d) Prayer for Relief. It shall be sufficient for the prosecuting entity to generally pray for a penalty range between the minimum and maximum penalties authorized by the corporate authorities of the prosecuting entity.
(e) Amendments. The charging document may be amended at any time, before or after judgment, to conform the pleadings to the proofs on just and reasonable terms. However, the amount of any default judgment appearing on the charging document under Rule 572(b) may not be amended after the entry of such judgment, without notice to defendant.
End
Plain-English Summary
An ordinance case can begin with different kinds of paperwork — a notice to appear, a uniform citation, or a formal complaint — and Rule 572 sets what every version has to include: the prosecuting entity's name, the defendant's name and address if known, the ordinance allegedly violated, the date and place to appear, how to avoid that appearance, and notice of the right to demand a jury trial.
A uniform citation gets signed by the officer who issued it; any other charging document needs the prosecuting attorney's signature and verification. If the prosecuting entity intends to seek a default judgment or a warrant for a no-show, the document has to spell out the exact dollar amount at stake and warn about the possibility of arrest.
The rule also gives some flexibility on the back end: multiple parking violations — even day-by-day violations under a per-day fine ordinance — can be charged in a single count, the prayer for relief just needs to name a penalty range, and the charging document can be amended before or after judgment to match the proof, though a stated default-judgment amount can't change after judgment without notice to the defendant.
Frequently Asked Questions
What has to be on the ticket or complaint for an ordinance violation?
The prosecuting entity's name, your name and address if known, the ordinance you allegedly broke, your court date, how to avoid appearing, and notice of your right to demand a jury.
Who has to sign the charging document?
A peace officer or authorized code enforcement officer for a uniform citation, or the prosecuting attorney for any other charging document.
Can several parking tickets be combined into one case?
Yes, multiple violations — including day-by-day violations — can be charged in a single count if clearly stated.
What if the document seeks a default judgment against me for not appearing?
It has to state the exact dollar amount of that judgment and warn that an arrest warrant may issue.
Can the charging document be changed after it's filed?
Yes, it can be amended before or after judgment to match the proof, though a stated default-judgment amount can't change after judgment without notice to the defendant.
Committee Comments and Commentary
(December 7, 2011)
Many prosecuting entities have created hybrid complaints that serve both as notice to appear and the charging document itself, similar to a traffic citation. Since an ordinance violation prosecution incorporates aspects of both criminal and civil procedures, the more general term “charging document” phrase is used. (a) Rule 572 is intended to provide flexibility in the initiation of an ordinance violation prosecution. The Municipal Code states that “the first process shall be a summons or a warrant.” 65 ILCS 5/1-2-9. Many prosecuting entities, however, begin with a “Notice to Appear” which is provided for in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 725 ILCS 5/1 07-12: (a) Whenever a peace officer is authorized to arrest a person without a warrant he may instead issue to such a person a notice to appear *** (c) Upon failure of the person to appear a summons or warrant of arrest may issue.” A notice to appear “is a means by which a person may be brought before the court without the inconvenience of immediate arrest ***. Such a notice may be issued whenever a peace officer has probable cause to make a warrantless arrest.” People v. Warren, 173 Ill. 2d 348, 357 (1996). The purpose of this rule is to continue to allow prosecuting entities to utilize the most efficient means of initiating ordinance violation proceedings. “Notices to Appear” are an appropriate and reasonable means of informing defendants of charges against them and are similar to citations issued in traffic cases.
This does not prohibit a prosecuting entity from obtaining an arrest warrant based upon probable cause, as authorized in section 1-2-9 of the Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/1-2-9).
This rule also makes it clear that an attorney need not sign the charging document in every case. This is especially important where the process is initiated by a nonattorney such as a police officer or code enforcement officer.
(b) This section provides for issuance of default judgments or warrants upon a failure to appear.
(c) This is intended to minimize paperwork and codify the decision in Village of Oak Park v. Flanagan, 35 Ill. App. 3d 6 (1st Dist. 1975). The Village of Oak Park case involved prosecution for multiple parking tickets in which the court held that a computer printout was sufficient to comply with the requirements of pleading for ordinance violations. Note, however, this rule is not meant to contravene the one act, one crime rule identified in Village of Sugar Grove v. James Rich, 347 Ill. App. 3d 689 (1st Dist. 2004).
(d) Section 2-604 of the Code of Civil Procedure requires a “specific” prayer for relief. 735 ILCS 5/2-604. This paragraph is intended to make it clear that a prayer for a penalty within the penalty range authorized by the ordinance is sufficiently specific to advise the defendant of the maximum penalty to which they are exposed.
(e) Section 2-616(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure specifically permits amendments to civil pleadings at various times. 735 ILCS 5/2-616(a). The purpose is to avoid minor errors in the charging document being a cause of a finding of not guilty when a violation has been proved by the requisite proof. The last sentence enforces the requirement of Rule 572(b) that if the prosecuting entity will seek a default judgment, it must state the specific amount in the charging document or combination of documents served upon the defendant.
Amendment History
Adopted December 7, 2011, effective immediately; amended Oct. 27, 2022, eff. Sept. 18, 2023; amended June 3, 2025, eff. immediately.
Source & verification. Rule text, official Committee Comments, and
amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Illinois Supreme Court Rules,
promulgated by the Supreme Court of Illinois. Last verified July 20, 2026.
· Official source
Also known as: parking ticket requirements Illinoisordinance violation complaint formnotice to appear ordinance ticketdefault judgment ordinance violation