K.S.A. 60-213.Counterclaims and cross-claims
Last amended July 1, 2010 · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of K.S.A. 60-213
Amendment History
L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-213; amended by Supreme Court order dated July 17, 1969; L. 1976, ch. 251, § 3; L. 1986, ch. 115, § 90; L. 1986, ch. 215, § 2; L. 1986, ch. 215, § 3; L. 2000, ch. 161, § 110; L. 2010, ch. 135, § 80; July 1.
Plain-English Summary
Subsection (a) makes a counterclaim compulsory when it arises out of the same transaction or occurrence as the opposing party's claim and doesn't require adding a party the court can't reach. Miss that one and you generally can't bring it later in a separate suit. Two exceptions let a pleader hold the claim back: if it was already the subject of another pending action when this one was commenced, or if the opposing party sued by attachment or similar process that never gave the court personal jurisdiction over the pleader on that claim, provided the pleader doesn't assert any counterclaim at all in this action.
Subsection (b) covers everything else -- a party may state any other counterclaim against an opposing party as a permissive counterclaim, whether or not it's related to the claim it answers. Subsection (c) frees a counterclaim from having to offset the opposing party's recovery: it can seek more money or a different kind of relief entirely. Subsection (d) protects a related claim from being wiped out by an assignment, the other party's death, or the running of a limitations period, so long as it could have been brought as a counterclaim or crossclaim if that party had sued first -- though recovery on it is capped at whatever was awarded to the opposing party. Subsection (e) lets a party bring in a counterclaim that matured or was acquired after the original pleading was filed, by supplemental pleading with the court's permission.
Crossclaims against a co-party follow their own logic in subsections (f) and (g). When a claim is governed by the comparative-fault procedure in K.S.A. 60-258a, a related crossclaim against a co-party is compulsory. Otherwise a crossclaim is permissive whenever it arises from the same transaction or occurrence as the original action or a counterclaim, or relates to property that's the subject of the action, and it can include a claim that the co-party owes all or part of whatever the crossclaimant might owe. Subsection (h) sends the question of adding new parties to a counterclaim or crossclaim to K.S.A. 60-219 and 60-220, and subsection (i) says that when the court has ordered separate trials under K.S.A. 60-242(b), it may enter judgment on a counterclaim or crossclaim under K.S.A. 60-254(b) even though the opposing party's own claims have been dismissed or otherwise resolved, if it has jurisdiction to do so.
Frequently Asked Questions
What makes a counterclaim compulsory rather than permissive in Kansas?
Under subsection (a), a counterclaim is compulsory if it arises out of the same transaction or occurrence as the opposing party's claim and doesn't require joining someone the court lacks jurisdiction over. A counterclaim that doesn't meet both conditions is permissive under subsection (b) and can be brought or left out at the pleader's choice.
Does my counterclaim have to seek the same type or amount of relief as the original claim?
No. Subsection (c) states a counterclaim need not diminish or defeat the opposing party's recovery, and it can request relief exceeding the opposing party's demand in amount or differing from it in kind.
Can the other side's death or the statute of limitations wipe out my related claim?
Not entirely. Subsection (d) preserves a claim arising from the same contract or transaction, or connected to the subject of the action, against an assignment, the other party's death, or an expired limitations period, provided it could have been asserted as a counterclaim or crossclaim. Recovery on it, though, is limited to the amount awarded against the pleader.
What is the difference between a crossclaim and a counterclaim under this section?
A counterclaim under subsections (a) and (b) is a claim against an opposing party. A crossclaim under subsections (f) and (g) is a claim against a co-party, and it must relate to the same transaction, occurrence, or property at issue in the original action or a counterclaim.
Can I add a counterclaim I didn't have when I first answered?
Yes. Subsection (e) allows the court to permit a supplemental pleading asserting a counterclaim that matured or was acquired after the earlier pleading was served.