Art. 1443.Examination and Cross-Examination; Record of Examination; Oath; Objections
Book II. Ordinary Proceedings · Title III. Production of Evidence · Chapter 3. Discovery · Last amended 2010 · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 1443
Amendment History
Acts 1976, No. 574, §1; Acts 1988, No. 515, §2, eff. 1/1/1989; Acts 1990, No. 295, §1; Acts 1990, No. 842, §1, eff. 7/24/1990; Acts 1997, No. 1056, §1; Acts 2004, No. 365, §1; Acts 2010, No. 456, §1; Acts 2010, No. 458, §1.
Plain-English Summary
Once the deposition starts, Paragraph A sets the basic mechanics. Examination and cross-examination proceed the way they would at trial, governed by the Louisiana Code of Evidence. The officer presiding over the deposition — defined in Paragraph C as a certified shorthand reporter or an official or deputy court reporter — administers the oath and records the testimony, either personally or through someone acting under their direction, stenographically or by another method, with a transcript prepared if any party asks for one.
Paragraph B controls how objections work without a judge in the room. The officer notes objections on the record rather than ruling on them, and recording stops only if every counsel and party present agrees or the deposition is terminated or suspended under Article 1444. Objections have to be stated concisely, without argument and without suggesting an answer to the witness — the rule against coaching a deponent through a "speaking objection." Testimony objected to is still taken, subject to the objection, so the deposition keeps moving and the fight over admissibility waits for another day. Counsel must stay professional throughout, and are subject to the court's contempt power for failing to. Rather than examine live, a party can instead serve written questions in a sealed envelope on the party taking the deposition, who transmits them to the officer to read to the witness.
Paragraph D reserves most objections for trial or whatever later use is made of the deposition, unless the parties stipulate otherwise or Article 1455 says differently. Instructing a witness not to answer at all is reserved for a short list of situations: preserving a privilege, enforcing a limit the court has already imposed, blocking harassing or repetitious questions, or heading off questions seeking information that is neither admissible nor reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. Paragraph E backs this up with teeth: a court that finds an objection violated the article can order the violating party to pay for editing or redacting the transcript or video, plus other costs or sanctions, absent good cause shown.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a lawyer instruct a witness not to answer a deposition question in Louisiana?
Only in narrow circumstances: to preserve a privilege, to enforce a court-ordered limitation, to prevent harassing or repetitious questions, or to prevent questions seeking information that is neither admissible nor reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence.
Are objections argued and ruled on during a Louisiana deposition?
No. The officer notes objections on the record but does not rule on them. Testimony objected to is still taken, subject to the objection, and the ruling waits for trial or other use of the deposition.
Who qualifies as the officer at a Louisiana deposition?
A certified shorthand reporter holding a valid certificate, or an official or deputy official court reporter, as those terms are defined by statute.
What happens if a lawyer makes improper speaking objections at a deposition?
A court that finds an objection violated Article 1443's requirements can order the violating party to pay for editing or redacting the transcript or video, along with other costs or sanctions, unless good cause is shown.