Rule 2-415.Deposition — Procedure
Circuit Court · Last amended January 1, 2019 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 2-415
Amendment History
Amended Mar. 22, 1991, effective July 1, 1991; Dec. 16, 1999, effective Jan. 1, 2000; Dec. 8, 2003, effective July 1, 2004; December 7, 2015, effective January 1, 2016; October 10, 2018, effective January 1, 2019.
Committee Note & Source
Cross references. See Rule 2-501 (e) for the consequences of filing an affidavit or other written statement under oath that contradicts deposition testimony that was not changed within the time allowed by this section.
Committee note. During the taking of a deposition, it is presumptively improper for an attorney to make objections that are not consistent with Rule 2-415 (h). Objections should be stated as simply, concisely, and non-argumentatively as possible to avoid coaching or making suggestions to the deponent and to minimize interruptions in the questioning of the deponent. Examples include “objection, leading;” “objection, asked and answered;” and “objection, compound question.”
Source. This Rule is derived as follows:
Section (a) is derived from former Rule 409 c.
Section (b) is derived from former Rule 409 a.
Section (c) is derived from former Rule 411 b 3.
Section (d) is derived from in part from former Rules 411 a and 412 e and in part from the 1993 version of Fed. R. Civ. P. 30 (e).
Section (e) is derived from former Rule 411 b 1, 2 and 5.
Section (f) is derived from former Rule 411 b 4.
Section (g) is new.
Section (h) is derived from former Rules 409 c 2, and 412 c 1 and 2.
Section (i) is derived from former Rule 422 a 2.
Section (j) is new.
Section (k) is derived from former Rule 412 d and e.
Plain-English Summary
This rule is the operating manual for the deposition itself. The officer swears in the deponent and records the testimony (by stenographer or, under Rule 2-416, by audio or audio-video recording), and the testimony generally gets transcribed unless the parties agree to skip that step or a court waives it to avoid expense, hardship, or injustice. Examination and cross-examination proceed much like they would at trial, and a party can also submit written questions to the officer instead of asking them directly. Anything a deponent produces, like documents, can be inspected, copied, and marked, with rules for handling originals the producing person wants back. Once the transcript is ready, the deponent generally gets 30 days to read it, sign it, and note any corrections on a separate sheet explaining the reason for each change; if the deponent misses that deadline, the officer certifies the transcript and it can be used as if the deponent had signed it. A correction sheet with substantive changes can trigger a further deposition limited to those changes, unless the court blocks it with a protective order.
The rule also governs how objections and disputes get handled. Objections to how the deposition was conducted have to be made on the spot or they're waived, though objections to a witness's competency or to the relevance of testimony survive even without a contemporaneous objection, unless the problem was the kind that could have been fixed if raised at the time. Objections should be short and neutral, not a way to coach the witness; if a party wants to make a coaching-adjacent objection, the deponent can be excused from the room while it's made. If a deponent refuses to answer, the questioner has to push the rest of the examination as far as practical before running to court on a motion to compel. And any complaint about how the transcript itself was prepared, signed, certified, or handled has to come by a prompt motion to suppress, not a surprise objection at trial.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does a deponent have to review and sign a deposition transcript?
Thirty days from when the officer submits the transcript, unless the deponent and the parties waive the signature and review step entirely.
What happens if the deponent doesn't sign the transcript in time?
The officer signs it instead, certifying when it was submitted and that it wasn't returned in time. The transcript can then be used as if the deponent had signed it, unless the court later finds on a motion to suppress that the reason for the delay justifies rejecting part or all of it.
Can a deponent change their testimony after the deposition?
Yes, on the correction sheet that accompanies the signed transcript, along with a stated reason for each change. If the changes are substantive, any party can notice a further deposition limited to those changes, unless the court enters a protective order against it.
How should attorneys object during a deposition?
Objections should be stated specifically, concisely, and without argument or suggestion to the witness. If an objection risks coaching the deponent on how to answer, the deponent can be excused from the deposition while it's made.
What if a witness refuses to answer a deposition question?
The questioning attorney should finish the rest of the examination as far as practical before filing a motion for an order compelling discovery, rather than cutting the deposition short.
How do you challenge problems with how a deposition was recorded or transcribed?
By a motion to suppress all or part of the deposition, filed promptly after the defect is discovered or reasonably should have been discovered.