Rule 2-645.1.Garnishment of account in financial institution
Circuit Court · Last amended May 1, 2011 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 2-645.1
Amendment History
Added April 21, 2011, effective May 1, 2011.
Committee Note & Source
Committee note. Federal regulations found in 31 C.F.R. Part 212 contain requirements, prohibitions, and limitations applicable to the garnishment of accounts of a judgment debtor in a financial institution which prevail over any inconsistent State law. Relevant terms are defined in 31 C.F.R. § 212.3 including “account,” “account review,” “financial institution,” and “protected amount.” This Rule is intended to comply with the Federal requirements.
Source. This Rule is new.
Plain-English Summary
Federal regulations shield certain benefit payments — Social Security among them — once they land in a bank account by direct deposit. Rule 2-645.1 folds that federal scheme into Maryland's garnishment procedure for any account covered by it, borrowing its definitions directly from the federal regulation. Rule 2-645 still governs the garnishment, but where the two conflict, this rule controls, and any federal requirement not already covered by Rule 2-645 applies on top of it.
Unless a federal Notice of Right to Garnish Federal Benefits already accompanies the writ, the writ served on a covered financial institution has to direct it not to hold any protected amount — whether already in the account or arriving later — and to otherwise follow the federal rules. The writ must also warn the debtor that some federal benefits are automatically shielded and won't be held, and that a claim covering any non-protected amount has to be filed within 30 days of service on the garnishee. When the garnishee answers, it only has to say whether a protected amount exists, not the exact figure, though it must still identify and hold any non-protected funds the account contained as of the account review. If everything the garnishee holds turns out to be protected, the garnishee asks the court, as part of its answer, for judgment ending the garnishment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this rule replace the general garnishment procedure in Rule 2-645?
No. Rule 2-645 still applies, but Rule 2-645.1 controls wherever the two conflict, and it layers additional federal requirements on top.
What kind of accounts does this rule cover?
Accounts subject to the federal regulation protecting certain benefit payments, such as Social Security or other federal benefits deposited directly into a bank account.
Does the financial institution have to disclose the exact protected amount?
No. It only has to state whether a protected amount is present, though it must still identify and hold any non-protected funds in the account.
What happens if everything in the account is protected?
The garnishee asks the court, as part of its answer, to enter judgment ending the garnishment.
How long does a debtor have to claim an exemption on the non-protected funds?
30 days after the writ is served on the garnishee.