Rule 3-115.Attachment before judgment
District Court · Last amended January 1, 2003 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3-115
Amendment History
Amended Apr. 7, 1986, effective July 1, 1986; July 16, 1992; Oct. 31, 2002, effective Jan. 1, 2003.
Committee Note & Source
Cross references. Code, Courts Art. §§ 3-302, 3-303, 3-304, 3-305.
Committee note. This section abolishes a former practice of having two separate cases, the “short note case” and the “attachment case.”
Source. This Rule is derived as follows: Section (a) is in part new and in part derived from former M.D.R. G40 a and b. Section (b) is derived from former M.D.R. G43. Section (c) is derived from former M.D.R. G44. Section (d) is in part derived from former M.D.R. G45 and in part new. Section (e) is derived from M.D.R. G47 c. Section (f) is new. Section (g) is new. Section (h) is derived from former M.D.R. G51. Section (i) is new. Section (j) is in part new and in part derived from former M.D.R. G60. Section (k) is new. Section (l) is derived from former M.D.R. G59.
Plain-English Summary
Attachment before judgment lets a plaintiff tie up a defendant's property while the case is still pending, so there's something left to collect if the plaintiff wins. This rule — the District Court's version of Rule 2-115 — walks through the entire life cycle of that remedy: requesting the writ, getting it issued, executing it, protecting the defendant, and resolving what happens to the property once judgment is entered.
The request can be made ex parte, without notifying the defendant first, but it isn't automatic. The plaintiff has to file an affidavit backing up both the underlying claim and the specific grounds for attachment, and the court reviews the complaint, exhibits, and affidavit before ordering the writ. Approval comes with a bond requirement, set by the court, to cover the defendant's costs and damages if the attachment turns out to be wrongful. Once the writ issues, a levy on property follows the same procedure as post-judgment execution under Rules 3-641 and 3-642, and a garnishment follows Rule 3-645 — except no judgment is entered against the garnishee until the plaintiff wins the underlying claim.
The rule also protects defendants at several points. An attachment made before the defendant is served dissolves automatically after 60 days unless service — or, for an absent defendant, publication under Rule 2-122 — happens in time, though the court can extend that window by another 60 days for good cause. A defendant who has appeared can get the property released by posting a bond, or can move for release or dissolution on several grounds, including that the plaintiff hasn't shown a likelihood of success or that the property is exempt from attachment by law. If a defendant's release motion is filed before the response deadline under Rule 3-307, filing it counts as an appearance for that limited purpose only, and a party who wants a hearing on such a motion asks for one under Rule 3-311(e).
One piece has no counterpart in the circuit courts' version: section (e) sets out how a Notice of Lien gets filed and recorded when the attached property is real estate, with separate filing instructions depending on whether the property sits in Baltimore City or elsewhere. Because the District Court doesn't maintain land records the way the circuit courts do, this section routes the lien notice to the right recording office — the District Court sitting in Baltimore City for property there, or the circuit court for the county where the property is located everywhere else.
Frequently Asked Questions
What has to be filed to request attachment before judgment in the District Court?
A request for the writ, filed either with the complaint or while the case is pending, along with an affidavit that verifies the facts in the complaint and states the specific grounds for entitlement to attachment. The request can be made ex parte, without notice to the defendant.
How is this different from the circuit courts' attachment-before-judgment rule?
The core procedure tracks Rule 2-115 closely — same ex parte request, same bond requirement, same grounds for release. The main District Court-specific addition is section (e), which spells out how to record a Notice of Lien when real property is attached, including separate filing instructions for property in Baltimore City versus elsewhere. Cross-references throughout also point to District Court-specific rules, like Rule 3-307 for the response deadline and Rule 3-311(e) for requesting a hearing, rather than their circuit court counterparts.
What happens if the defendant is never served after property is attached?
The attachment automatically dissolves 60 days after the levy or garnishment unless the defendant is served, or publication under Rule 2-122 is at least begun and later completed, within that time. The court can extend the 60-day window by up to 60 more days for good cause, on a timely request.
Can a defendant get attached property back before the case is over?
Yes, several ways. A defendant who has appeared can post a bond to release the property. A defendant who has appeared can also move for release on grounds like the case being dismissed or settled, the plaintiff's failure to show a likelihood of success, or undue hardship where substitute property is offered. And any defendant or garnishee can seek release on the ground that the property is automatically exempt from attachment, or seek dissolution on the ground that the plaintiff wasn't entitled to attachment in the first place.
What if the court never gets personal jurisdiction over the defendant?
Any judgment for the plaintiff becomes an in rem judgment limited to the attached property. Satisfying that judgment from the property doesn't bar the plaintiff from separately pursuing any unpaid balance in the same or another action later.
Is attachment before judgment available in every District Court civil case?
No. It's available only to a plaintiff who is entitled to it by statute, and it fits within the District Court's broader role handling smaller-scale, summary civil matters rather than being a general-purpose remedy available in every case.