Rule 2.225.Joinder of Party to Control Venue
Current through May 1, 2026 · Last verified July 6, 2026
Full Text of Rule 2.225
Amendment History
Michigan tracks the orders that adopt and amend its Court Rules in a separate administrative record rather than printing a history note beneath each rule in the compiled rules text reproduced here. The text above is verified current through the source’s own May 1, 2026 update; for the full order-by-order history of this rule, see the Michigan Supreme Court’s rules and orders page.
Plain-English Summary
On a defendant's motion, venue must be changed on a showing that it is proper in the current court only because of the joinder of a codefendant who wasn't joined in good faith, but only to control where the case would be heard. That showing made, the same transfer mechanics apply as for an ordinary improper-venue transfer: a state-approved transfer order, service on the parties and the receiving court, and a requirement that the plaintiff pay the receiving court's filing fee — and, where necessary to accomplish the transfer, the defendant's reasonable compensation and attorney fees — generally within 28 days of the transfer order or the receiving court dismisses the case, with any jury fee already paid forwarded along with it.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "joinder to control venue"?
It's when a plaintiff names a codefendant, in bad faith, for the real purpose of keeping a case in a county that would not otherwise be a proper venue.
What do I have to prove to get venue changed on this ground?
That venue is proper in the current court only because of the codefendant's joinder, and that the codefendant was joined in bad faith rather than as a genuine party to the dispute.
Who pays if the court finds bad-faith joinder?
The plaintiff pays the receiving court's filing fee, and possibly the defendant's attorney fees and expenses, generally within 28 days of the transfer order.