Rule 2.308.Use of Depositions in Court Proceedings
Current through May 1, 2026 · Last verified July 6, 2026
Full Text of Rule 2.308
Amendment History
Michigan tracks the orders that adopt and amend its Court Rules in a separate administrative record rather than printing a history note beneath each rule in the compiled rules text reproduced here. The text above is verified current through the source’s own May 1, 2026 update; for the full order-by-order history of this rule, see the Michigan Supreme Court’s rules and orders page.
Plain-English Summary
Taking a deposition and using it in court are two different things; Rule 2.308 only speaks to the second. A deposition or part of one is admissible at a hearing or trial only to the extent the Michigan Rules of Evidence allow it, and any evidence issue that would keep the same testimony out of a live trial can still be raised when the deposition is offered.
What can trip a party up is timing. Problems with the deposition notice, or with the qualifications of the person who presided over it, are waived unless raised promptly — before the deposition even starts, for a disqualification issue, or as soon as the problem is discovered. Objections to a witness's competency or to the relevance of testimony are different: they survive even if never raised during the deposition, unless the problem could have been fixed had someone objected at the time. So do most objections to how the deposition was conducted, worded, or recorded, so long as they're raised as soon as reasonably possible; the same logic applies to how the transcript itself was prepared, certified, or filed. Even when an error was never properly preserved at all, the rule has a safety valve: none of these missteps keep a deposition out of evidence unless the court finds the error truly destroyed the deposition's value as evidence or made using it unfair.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use any part of a deposition at trial?
Only to the extent the Michigan Rules of Evidence would allow that testimony in if the witness were on the stand live; the deposition format doesn't change what evidence rules otherwise require.
What happens if I don't object to something at the deposition itself?
It depends on the objection. Problems with notice or the disqualification of the person taking the deposition are waived if not raised promptly. Objections to a witness's competency or to relevance generally survive regardless of when they're raised, unless the problem could have been fixed by objecting at the time.
Can a deposition be thrown out over a technical error even if no one objected?
Only if the court finds that the error truly destroyed the deposition's value as evidence or made its use unfair; harmless technical errors don't block a deposition from being used.