Rule 2.504.Dismissal of Actions
Current through May 1, 2026 · Last verified July 6, 2026
Full Text of Rule 2.504
Amendment History
Michigan tracks the orders that adopt and amend its Court Rules in a separate administrative record rather than printing a history note beneath each rule in the compiled rules text reproduced here. The text above is verified current through the source’s own May 1, 2026 update; for the full order-by-order history of this rule, see the Michigan Supreme Court’s rules and orders page.
Plain-English Summary
Early in a case, before the defendant answers or moves under Rule 2.116, a plaintiff can dismiss the whole action just by filing a notice, no judge's signature required, or the parties can jointly file a stipulated dismissal at any point; either route runs on the payment of costs. Either way the dismissal is generally without prejudice — unless the notice or stipulation says otherwise — with one sharp exception: if the same plaintiff has already dismissed an action based on the same claim once before, in any court, this kind of notice dismissal counts as a full adjudication on the merits the second time around, closing the door on a third try. Once the window for a no-order dismissal has closed, the plaintiff needs the court's permission, on terms the court thinks proper, and if the defendant has already pleaded a counterclaim before being served with the dismissal motion, the court can't dismiss the plaintiff's case over the defendant's objection unless that counterclaim can still be adjudicated on its own.
Involuntary dismissal covers different ground: if a party ignores the rules or a court order, the court can enter a default or dismiss that party's claims, on motion or on its own initiative. In a bench trial, once the plaintiff has put on its evidence, the defendant can move for dismissal on the ground that the plaintiff hasn't shown a right to relief on the facts and the law, without giving up the right to put on its own evidence if the motion fails; the court can rule right away or wait until all the evidence is in, and a judgment against the plaintiff on the merits requires the court to make findings under Rule 2.517. Unless the court says otherwise, most involuntary dismissals operate as adjudications on the merits, with two notable exceptions carved out: a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, and a dismissal for failing to join a necessary party. The same basic framework applies to a voluntarily dismissed counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, and a plaintiff who refiles a once-dismissed claim can be made to pay the costs of the earlier, dismissed action before the new one proceeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I dismiss my own lawsuit without asking the judge?
Yes, early on — before the defendant answers or moves under Rule 2.116 — by filing a notice of dismissal, or at any point by filing a stipulation signed by all the parties. Either route requires payment of costs.
What happens if I dismiss the same claim twice this way?
The second notice dismissal of an action based on the same claim operates as a full adjudication on the merits, meaning you generally can't bring that claim a third time.
Does an involuntary dismissal count as a final decision against me?
Generally yes, unless the court specifies otherwise, with two key exceptions: a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction and a dismissal for failure to join a necessary party don't operate as adjudications on the merits.
Can the court dismiss my case if the defendant already filed a counterclaim?
Not over the defendant's objection, if the counterclaim was pleaded before you moved to dismiss, unless the counterclaim can still be independently adjudicated by the court.