Rule 84.05.Briefs -- When and By Whom Filed.
Part II · Rule 84: Procedure in All Appellate Courts · Last amended January 1, 2024 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of Rule 84.05
Amendment History
Adopted June 13, 1979, eff. Jan. 1, 1980. Amended July 27, 1979; Amended April 21, 1988, eff. Jan. 1, 1989; Amended June 1, 1993, eff. Jan. 1, 1994; Amended Sept. 28, 1993, eff. Jan. 1, 1994; Amended April 23, 1996, eff. Jan. 1, 1997; Amended Oct. 2, 1996, eff. Jan. 1, 1997; Amended Nov. 26, 1997, eff. July 1, 1998; Amended May 26, 2000, eff. Jan. 1, 2001; Amended Dec. 15, 2000, eff. July 1, 2001. Amended May 23, 2001, eff. Jan. 1, 2002. Amended Dec. 18, 2007, eff. July 1, 2008. Amended Dec. 22, 2009, eff. July 1, 2010; Amended June 25, 2010, eff. Jan. 1, 2010; Amended May 19, 2016, eff. Jan. 1, 2017; Amended March 7, 2022, eff. Jan. 1, 2024.
Plain-English Summary
Once the record on appeal is filed, Rule 84.05 sets the clock running: the appellant has 60 days to file the opening brief, the respondent has 30 days after that, and the appellant may file a reply within 15 days after the respondent’s brief. A cross appeal adds a step — after the respondent/cross-appellant’s brief, the appellant gets 30 days to respond to the cross appeal and reply on the main appeal, and the cross-appellant then has 15 days for a final reply. The appellate court can shorten or lengthen any of these periods by order in a specific case.
The rule flips the usual order in two situations. First, when a trial court grants a new trial without stating on the record which ground it relied on, the rule presumes the trial court erred, and puts the burden of defending that ruling on the respondent. If the appellant requests it in a timely statement before the record on appeal is filed, the respondent must file the opening and any reply brief within the time the appellant would normally have, and the appellant then answers within the respondent’s normal time. A trial court that grants a new trial without specifying discretionary grounds is never presumed to have acted on a discretionary basis. Second, when a circuit court reverses an administrative agency’s decision and the appellate court reviews the agency’s decision instead of the circuit court’s, the party aggrieved by the circuit court’s decision must file the notice of appeal and the record on appeal, along with a notice designating which party is aggrieved by the agency’s decision. That designated party — the one aggrieved by the agency’s decision — then files the opening brief and any reply within the appellant’s normal time.
Tucked into this rule are also the terms for amicus curiae participation before this Court — suggestions on an application for transfer or a merits brief may be filed only with the consent of all parties or by court order, subject to page limits and timing tied to the filings they support, with an exception for the attorney general or an authorized state entity. If a party required to file the first brief under this rule fails to do so, that party is subject to the notice-of-dismissal procedure in Rule 84.08.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does an appellant have to file the opening brief?
Sixty days after the record on appeal is filed with the clerk of the appellate court.
What are the deadlines for a respondent’s brief and a reply brief?
Thirty days for the respondent’s brief after the appellant’s brief is filed, and 15 days for any reply after that, unless the court orders different periods.
What happens if the trial court grants a new trial without saying why?
The rule presumes the trial court erred and puts the burden on the respondent, who may have to file the opening brief first if the appellant makes a timely request before the record is filed.
Who has to file the first brief when a circuit court reversed an agency decision that the appellate court is now reviewing?
The party aggrieved by the agency’s decision files the opening brief, but it is the party aggrieved by the circuit court’s decision who files the notice of appeal and the notice designating which party that is.
Can someone who isn’t a party file a brief in support of one side?
An amicus curiae may file suggestions or a brief only with the consent of all parties or by order of the court, and subject to page and timing limits.
What happens if a party required to file the first brief under this rule doesn’t?
That party is subject to the notice-of-dismissal procedure described in Rule 84.08.