Rule 53.Masters, Referees, and Commissioners
Chapter VI: Trials · Last amended April 13, 2000 · Last verified July 14, 2026
Full Text of Rule 53
Amendment History
Effective April 13, 2000, Rule 53(c) was amended to give the court discretion to appoint a master on the written consent of the parties without a showing of an exceptional condition. 753-754 So. 2d. XVII (West Miss.Cas. 2000). Effective March 1, 1989, Rule 53 was amended to correct a typographical error. 536-538 So. 2d XXVII (West Miss. Cas. 1989).
Plain-English Summary
Rule 53 gives courts a way to hand off part of a case to someone else to investigate and report back. The rule's definition of "master" is broad, sweeping in referees, auditors, examiners, commissioners, and special commissioners, and the master earns reasonable compensation fixed by law or the court, taxed as part of the costs. A master ordinarily must be an attorney licensed to practice in Mississippi, though the rule carves out room for a non-attorney with the right expertise when the finding needed is complex and technical rather than legal — and a non-attorney can also serve as a special commissioner running a court-ordered sale or partition of property.
A reference to a master can happen by the parties' written consent on any issue, or without consent only when some exceptional condition requires it. Once the court refers a matter, the order can narrow the master's job to particular issues or tasks, or leave the master to receive and report evidence generally, and it can set deadlines for the hearing and the report. Within those bounds, the master runs the proceeding — administering oaths, examining witnesses, directing subpoenas, and compelling a witness who doesn't show up. The master must set the first meeting with the parties within ten days of the reference and move the matter along with reasonable diligence; either side can ask the court to speed things up.
The master's report goes to the clerk along with a transcript and exhibits unless the referring order says otherwise, and the clerk notifies every party once it's filed. Any party then has ten days to serve written objections. The court must accept the master's factual findings unless they're manifestly wrong, and it can adopt, modify, reject, or send the report back with instructions, or take more evidence itself. If the parties stipulated in advance that the master's findings would be final, only questions of law survive for the court to decide. A master may also circulate a draft report to counsel before filing it, to gather their input. Finally, when a special commissioner is appointed to conduct a sale, the court can require a bond payable to the State of Mississippi to secure any money that passes through the commissioner's hands.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a "master" under Mississippi's civil rules?
Rule 53(a) defines the term broadly to include a referee, an auditor, an examiner, a commissioner, and a special commissioner — any person the court appoints to handle a matter referred to them under this rule.
Does a master have to be a licensed attorney?
Generally yes. Rule 53(b) requires a master to be an attorney authorized to practice in Mississippi, but it allows a non-attorney with the relevant expertise when the finding needed is complex and technical rather than legal, and non-attorneys may also serve as special commissioners conducting sales or partitions.
Can a court refer an issue to a master without both parties agreeing?
Yes, but only upon a showing that some exceptional condition requires it. With the parties' written consent, the court can refer any issue of fact or law to a master without that showing.
How long do I have to object to a master's report?
Rule 53(g)(2) gives you ten days after being served notice that the report was filed to serve written objections on the other parties.
Is a master's factual findings binding on the trial court?
The court must accept the master's findings of fact unless they are manifestly wrong. If the parties stipulated in advance that the master's findings would be final, Rule 53(g)(3) limits the court to deciding only the legal questions the report raises.