§ 6-1521.Protection of personal and financial information in civil court records.
Article 15: Uniform District Court Rules of Practice and Procedure · Last amended January 1, 2022 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 6-1521
Amendment History
Rule 21 adopted April 16, 2008. Renumbered and codified as § 6-1521, effective July 18, 2008; § 16-1521(B) and (F) amended January 27, 2010; § 6-1521(B) amended May 16, 2012; § 6-1521 amended June 9, 2021, effective January 1, 2022; § 6-1521 amended November 17, 2021, effective January 1, 2022.
Plain-English Summary
Court files in civil cases are, by default, open to the public, but that openness creates risk when a filing happens to include a Social Security number, a birth date, or a bank account number. Section 6-1521 addresses that risk directly. It requires the sensitive categories of information — birth dates, gender, Social Security numbers, and financial account numbers, including a minor child’s — to be kept out of pleadings, exhibits, orders, judgments, and decrees that the public can see.
Instead of scattering that information through the case file, the rule channels it into a single confidential document, described in the rules as an Appendix 3 form. That form gets submitted electronically or, if on paper, marked at the top with bold confidentiality language, and the clerk keeps it apart from the public case file while still leaving it accessible to judges and court staff. Government agencies and officials can get access to the electronic version of this data, but only through agency agreements the Nebraska Supreme Court has approved, applied for on a designated form.
The rule reaches beyond pleadings into the orders and decrees a court itself issues. A divorce decree, a paternity order, a child support order — none of these can include the protected information directly; instead they reference the separate Appendix 3 document. If a court decides an order needs to state a Social Security number, the original gets sealed, and a redacted version goes into the public file. The rule also limits how much of a financial account number can appear in a trial exhibit, calling for redaction to protect against misuse while still letting the parties, court, and jury distinguish between similar accounts when that distinction matters to the case.
Responsibility for redacting this information rests with the parties and their counsel, not the clerk. The clerk is not obligated to review every filing for compliance, though a clerk who spots a violation may choose to make a redacted copy available to the public while preserving the unaltered original for the court and the parties.
Frequently Asked Questions
What kinds of personal information does this rule keep out of the public court file?
Birth dates, gender, Social Security numbers, and financial account numbers for any person, including minor children, involved in a civil case.
How do I submit protected information if a court still needs it?
You submit it in a separate confidential document known as the Appendix 3 form, filed electronically or, if on paper, marked as confidential at the top, and the clerk keeps it apart from the public case file.
Can a divorce decree or child support order include a Social Security number directly?
Not in the public version. If the order needs the number, the court seals the original and places a redacted version in the public file.
Who is responsible for making sure sensitive information gets redacted?
The parties and their counsel. The clerk of the court is not required to review documents for compliance, though a clerk who notices a violation may choose to provide a redacted copy for public access.
Can a government agency get access to the confidential financial and personal information filed under this rule?
Only through an agency agreement approved by the Nebraska Supreme Court, applied for on the form designated as Appendix 4.
What happens to account numbers used in trial exhibits?
A complete account number cannot appear in a trial exhibit. The party offering the exhibit must redact it to the extent necessary to prevent misuse, while still allowing the parties, court, and jury to tell similar accounts apart when relevant.