§ 6-328.Persons before whom depositions may be taken.
Article 3: Nebraska Court Rules of Discovery in Civil Cases. (Effective January 1, 2025.) · Last amended September 3, 2025 · Last verified July 22, 2026
This section prints two full, separately-dated versions in the official compilation (the January 1, 2025 discovery/pleading rewrite); both are shown below, current version first.
Full Text of § 6-328
Amendment History
Current version (effective January 1, 2025)
§ 6-328(e) and Comment amended January 27, 2021, effective February 16, 2021; § 6-328 amended November 13, 2024, effective January 1, 2025; § 6-328 amended September 3, 2025.
Prior version (in effect before January 1, 2025)
§ 6-328(e) and Comment amended January 27, 2021, effective February 16, 2021.
Official Comment
Current version (effective January 1, 2025)
COMMENTS TO § 6-328 [1] The original version of subpart (a) listed by title the officers before whom a deposition could be taken in Nebraska. The 2024 Amendments deleted the list and replaced it with a statement that a deposition may be taken in Nebraska before an officer authorized by law to administer oaths. Those officers are identified by statute. See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1002; Neb. Rev. Stat. § 64-107; Neb. Rev. Stat. § 64-107.01. The 2024 Amendments also added subpart (a)(3) to make it clear that the term “officer” as used in §§ 6-330 to 6-332 includes a person who serves as the deposition officer by stipulation of the parties. [2] Subpart (b) governs depositions taken in foreign countries for cases pending in Nebraska. The subpart was updated by the 2024 Amendments to include treaties and conventions. The original version of the rule included a subpart on taking depositions in Nebraska for cases pending in foreign countries. That subpart was deleted by the 2024 Amendments because it was unnecessary in light of 28 U.S.C. § 1782.
Prior version (in effect before January 1, 2025)
COMMENT TO RULE 28 Subsection (a) follows former Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1267.14 (Repealed 1982), with the deletion of mayors and master commissioners as unnecessary. Subsection (b) does not follow former Nebraska statutes; the language of federal rule 28(a) was adopted to describe the officer by reference to the laws of the sister state or of the United States. Subsection (c) is new language on depositions in foreign countries and is taken from federal rule 28(b) which sets out all possible ways of taking depositions outside the United States. Subsection (d) follows the language of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1267.17 (Repealed 1982), by applying the disqualification rule to both the officer and the person recording the testimony, if those are not the same person.
Plain-English Summary
A deposition needs someone to swear in the witness and oversee the proceeding, and Section 6-328 says who qualifies. Inside Nebraska, that officer must be someone the state’s law authorizes to administer oaths — the rule no longer names specific titles, relying instead on Nebraska statutes to identify who those officers are, and it makes clear the term “officer” also covers a person the parties themselves designate by stipulation. Elsewhere in the United States or its territories, the officer must be authorized to administer oaths under either federal law or the law of the place where the deposition happens, or must be a person the court appoints for that purpose.
Depositions abroad have more routes available: under a treaty or convention, through a letter of request (whether or not it is labeled a “letter rogatory”), before a person authorized to administer oaths locally or under federal law, or before someone the court commissions directly. None of these routes requires showing that some other method would be impracticable — a party can use a treaty-based method or a commission in a proper case without first ruling out alternatives. And evidence gathered abroad in response to a letter of request is not automatically excluded just because it lacks a verbatim transcript, was not taken under oath, or otherwise departs from how depositions run domestically.
One rule applies everywhere: the officer cannot be a relative, employee, or attorney of any party — or related to or employed by a party’s attorney — and cannot have a financial stake in the case.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is authorized to preside over a deposition taken within Nebraska?
An officer authorized by Nebraska law to administer oaths, which includes anyone the parties stipulate to serve as the deposition officer.
What if the deposition is taken in another U.S. state?
The officer must be authorized to administer oaths by federal law or the law of the place of examination, or must be a person the court appoints to administer oaths and take testimony.
How can a deposition be taken in a foreign country?
Under an applicable treaty or convention, by a letter of request, before a person authorized to administer oaths locally or under federal law, or before a person the court commissions.
Does a party have to show that other methods are impractical before using a letter of request or commission for a foreign deposition?
No. The rule does not require showing that taking the deposition another way would be impracticable or inconvenient.
Can someone related to a party or a party’s attorney serve as the deposition officer?
No. The rule disqualifies anyone who is a relative, employee, or attorney of a party, or related to or employed by a party’s attorney, or who has a financial interest in the case.
Is evidence from a foreign deposition excluded if it was not taken under oath?
Not automatically. Evidence obtained under a letter of request need not be excluded merely for lacking a verbatim transcript, an oath, or similar departures from the domestic requirements.