Rule 36.Standing Trial Orders -- Procedures
Group VII: Trials · Last amended January 1, 2019 · Last verified July 14, 2026
Full Text of Rule 36
Amendment History
Adopted May 22, 2013, eff. October 1, 2013; amended July 24, 2014, eff. September 1, 2014; November 5, 2018, eff. January 1, 2019.
2018: The 2018 amendment rewrote (d)(5)(i).
2014: The 2014 amendment substituted "motion" for "pleading" in (e).
Plain-English Summary
Rule 36 is the courtroom rulebook that applies by default in every trial. It covers basic decorum — standing to address the court or examine a witness, not approaching the bench without leave — and sets time limits: opening statements capped at 30 minutes and non-argumentative, closing arguments capped at an hour per side, unless the court says otherwise. It also requires furnishing opposing counsel a copy before reading trial-transcript excerpts to the jury, and requires seasonably sharing copies of exhibits like contracts and letters for the court's convenience.
A cluster of provisions governs witnesses: only one attorney per side may examine a given witness, redirect examination is limited to explaining cross-examination answers or addressing new matter absent leave of court, a dismissed witness cannot be recalled without permission, and someone who helped prepare the case cannot serve as an interpreter over objection. Special rules apply when an attorney is a witness — the attorney cannot be compelled to testify without written notice, due no later than 30 days after the opposing party discovers the attorney is a witness or 30 days after the attorney's appearance in the case, whichever is later, absent good cause shown — and an attorney who testifies at trial generally cannot also act as advocate there, apart from a few limited exceptions.
The rule also streamlines objections and preserves them without the old formality of "exceptions": stating the basis briefly (with a chance to approach the bench for more argument on request) is enough to preserve the issue, so long as the party gave the court the specific factual or legal basis for its position. It sets the traditional order of proof — plaintiff's whole case before resting, then defendant's whole defense, with only rebuttal evidence allowed afterward — and directs that motions to dismiss, mistrial motions, and offers of proof be made at the bench, out of the jury's hearing.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long can opening statements and closing arguments run?
Opening statements are capped at 30 minutes and may not be argumentative, and closing arguments are capped at one hour per side, unless the court directs otherwise in advance.
Can more than one attorney examine the same witness?
No. Rule 36(d)(1) permits only one counsel on each side to examine a given witness.
When can an attorney be compelled to testify, and can that attorney keep acting as advocate?
An attorney cannot be compelled to testify unless notified in writing that he or she will be summoned as a witness. Except for good cause shown, that notice is due no later than 30 days after the opposing party discovers the attorney is a witness in the matter, or 30 days after the attorney's appearance in the case, whichever occurs later. An attorney who does testify at trial generally cannot also act as advocate there, except on uncontested issues, testimony about the value of legal services, or where disqualification would work unreasonable hardship on the client.
Do parties still need to take formal exceptions to preserve an issue for appeal?
No. Rule 36(e) states that formal exceptions to non-evidentiary rulings are unnecessary; it is enough that a party makes known to the court, by motion or on the record, the action requested or the objection made, with the specific factual or legal basis for the position.
In what order do the parties present their evidence at trial?
Under Rule 36(g), the plaintiff must put in the whole case before resting and, absent good cause, cannot add evidence afterward except strict rebuttal; the defendant must likewise put in the whole defense before resting and afterward may only reply to the rebutting evidence.