Rule 1-024.Intervention
Last amended July 1, 1995 · Last verified June 26, 2026
Full Text of Rule 1-024
Rule History
[As amended, effective July 1, 1995.]
Plain-English Summary
This rule lets an outsider join a pending case. Intervention is of right—on timely application—when a statute confers an unconditional right, or when the applicant has an interest in the property or transaction at the heart of the case and deciding the case could, as a practical matter, impair its ability to protect that interest, unless existing parties already represent it adequately.
Permissive intervention is available, again on timely application, when a statute gives a conditional right or when the applicant’s claim or defense shares a common question of law or fact with the main action; a government officer or agency may intervene when a party relies on a statute or regulation it administers. In exercising discretion, the court weighs whether intervention would unduly delay or prejudice the original parties. Either way, the would-be intervenor serves a motion stating the grounds, accompanied by a pleading setting out the claim or defense.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between intervention of right and permissive intervention?
Intervention of right applies when a statute grants it or when the applicant’s interest may be impaired and is not adequately represented. Permissive intervention is discretionary and applies when the applicant’s claim shares a common question with the main action.
How does someone intervene?
By serving a timely motion that states the grounds and is accompanied by a pleading setting forth the claim or defense for which intervention is sought.