Rule 1-053.3.Guardians ad litem; domestic relations appointments
Last amended December 31, 2017 · Last verified June 26, 2026
Full Text of Rule 1-053.3
Rule History
[Provisionally approved by Supreme Court Order No. 06-8300-018, effective August 21, 2006; as amended by Supreme Court Order No. 07-8300-021, effective August 21, 2007; as amended by Supreme Court Order No. 17-8300-017, effective in all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2017.]
Committee Commentary
A guardian ad litem’s authority to claim or waive the privilege on behalf of the child under Subparagraph (I)(3) extends to any communication with the child that would be privileged if made by an adult. See, e.g., Rule 11-504(C)(2)(d) NMRA (providing that the privilege for communications between a patient and the patient’s physician, psychotherapist, or state or nationally licensed mental-health therapist may be claimed by “any other person included in the communication to further the patient’s interest”).
Paragraph J permits a guardian ad litem to call witnesses and to provide a verbal report and recommendations at any hearing or trial in the matter in which the guardian ad litem is appointed. Such participation does not implicate Rule 16-307 NMRA, which prohibits a lawyer from acting as an advocate in any proceeding in which the lawyer is likely to be a necessary witness. A guardian ad litem is, by definition, a “best interests attorney” who acts as “an arm of the court” and therefore is not an advocate for the purposes of Rule 16-307. If a guardian ad litem chooses to provide a verbal report, facts or data relied on by a guardian ad litem in forming an opinion in the case need not be admissible for the guardian ad litem’s opinion to be admitted. See Rule 11-703 NMRA; Thomas v. Thomas, 1999-NMCA-135, ¶ 25, 128 N.M. 177, 991 P.2d 7.
Guardian ad litem fees and costs under Paragraph K are in the nature of support of the child and therefore are not dischargeable in a bankruptcy proceeding. See, e.g., In re Miller, 55 F.3d 1487, 1490 (10th Cir. 1995) (“[D]ebts to a guardian ad litem, who is specifically charged with representing the child’s best interests . . . can be said to relate just as directly to the support of the child as attorney’s fees incurred by the parents in a custody proceeding.”) (citing In re Jones 9 F.3d 878, 881 (10th Cir. 1993) (holding that attorney’s fees in a custody proceeding are not dischargeable in bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5)).
[Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 17-8300-017, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2017.]
Plain-English Summary
This rule provides for a guardian ad litem in contested custody cases under Chapter 40. Appointed on the court’s or a party’s motion, the guardian ad litem serves as an arm of the court—a “best interests attorney” who acts independently of the child’s or either party’s directives and makes findings and recommendations. The appointment order, in substantial conformity with the approved form, specifies the role, tasks, and duration; the court may not delegate the ultimate best-interests determination. The rule lists factors guiding whether to appoint, such as the child’s age, the parties’ contentiousness, abuse history, and the ability to pay.
The guardian ad litem’s duties include interviewing the child (face-to-face if age six or older) and the parties, protecting the child’s best interests, and serving a written report and recommendations on the parties at least eleven days before filing. If the parties agree, they submit a stipulated order within eleven days; if not, a party may file specific objections and request a hearing within eleven days, and failing to object timely waives the right and lets the court adopt the recommendations without a hearing. The rule also protects the child–guardian communications as privileged and addresses fees and costs.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a guardian ad litem under this rule?
A “best interests attorney” appointed in a contested custody case who serves as an arm of the court, acts independently of the parties, and makes findings and recommendations on the child’s best interests.
What happens after the guardian ad litem files recommendations?
If the parties agree, they submit a stipulated order within eleven days. If not, a party may file specific objections and request a hearing within eleven days; failing to object timely waives the right, and the court must then enter an order adopting the recommendations without a hearing.