RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 1-071.2.Statutory stream system adjudication suits; stream system issue and expedited inter se proceedings

Last amended June 8, 2011 · Last verified June 26, 2026

In one sentenceRule 1-071.2 provides for designating a “stream system issue” and conducting expedited inter se proceedings in stream adjudications, with notice that binds all water rights claimants.

Full Text of Rule 1-071.2

Text sizeJump to: (A) (B) (C) (D)

A. Stream system issue proceedings.
(1) A stream system issue is any issue in a stream system adjudication suit conducted pursuant to Section 72-4-17 NMSA 1978 the resolution of which could directly affect the water rights of all or a significant number of water rights claimants, regardless of whether the claimants have been served and joined as defendants.
(2) At any time during the adjudication prior to the notice of commencement of inter se proceedings, any party may file a motion requesting that the court designate an issue as a "stream system issue". The motion shall include a short, concise description of the issue and the reasons why such a proceeding is necessary and identify the section or sections of the adjudication affected by the issue. The court sua sponte may consider designating a stream system issue.
(3) The court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether to designate an issue as a stream system issue. The court shall designate an issue as a stream system issue if
(a) the resolution of the issue could directly affect the water rights of all, or a significant number of, water rights claimants, whether served and joined as defendants or not; or
(b) the resolution of the issue in a manner that did not bind all water rights claimants on the stream system that have been joined or in the future might be joined, would create a substantial risk of the following:
(i) inconsistent or varying decisions of an issue the determination of which could directly affect the water rights of other defendants or claimants; or
(ii) a decision that, as a practical matter, would be dispositive of an issue relating to the subject matter of the adjudication and preclude other claimants similarly situated from challenging that decision.
(4) If the court designates an issue as a stream system issue, it shall enter an order defining the scope, timing and procedures to be followed in the stream system issue proceeding. Notice of the proceeding pursuant to Paragraph C of this rule shall be given to all claimants, regardless of whether they have been served and joined as defendants, in the sections of the stream system designated by the court. Unless the court orders otherwise or the parties otherwise agree, the movant requesting designation of the stream system issue shall provide the notice.
B. Expedited inter se proceedings.
(1) An expedited inter se proceeding is a proceeding in which a water rights claim is resolved in a stream system adjudication suit conducted pursuant to Section 72-4-17 NMSA 1978 both as between the plaintiff and the defendant and as among the defendant and other water rights claimants.
(2) The plaintiff or any claimant may file a motion requesting that the court designate an expedited inter se proceeding. The motion shall include a short, concise description of the defendant’s claims and the reasons why such a proceeding is necessary. The court sua sponte may consider designating an expedited inter se proceeding.
(3) The court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether to conduct an expedited inter se proceeding, and may proceed if it finds that such a proceeding will promote judicial efficiency and expeditious completion of the adjudication. Among the factors the court shall consider are the following:
(a) whether failure to proceed will injure the party asserting the claim;
(b) whether proceeding will injure those parties opposing the claim; and
(c) the expense and delay resulting from the failure to proceed.
(4) If the court finds that the criteria for an expedited inter se proceeding exist, it shall enter an order defining the scope, timing and procedures to be followed in the proceeding. Notice of the proceeding pursuant to Paragraph C of this rule shall be given to all claimants, regardless of whether they have been served and joined as defendants, in the sections of the stream system designated by the court. Unless the court orders otherwise or the parties otherwise agree, the movant requesting designation of the expedited inter se proceeding shall provide the notice.
C. Notice. Notwithstanding Rule 1-004 NMRA, notice of a stream system issue proceeding or an expedited inter se proceeding shall be given in accordance with this paragraph. Notice of a stream system issue proceeding or an expedited inter se proceeding shall be given to all claimants, regardless of whether they have been served and joined as defendants, claiming water rights within the section or sections of the stream system identified by the court. Notice shall be given by first class mail with proper postage to all known claimants whose names and addresses are reasonably ascertainable. For all unknown claimants and claimants whose addresses cannot reasonably be determined, notice shall be given in a manner reasonably calculated under all the circumstances to apprise claimants of the proceeding and shall be approved by the court.
(1) To the extent they are relevant, the following records, if available, shall be consulted to identify persons who may claim the right to use waters of the identified section or sections of the stream system:
(a) an existing hydrographic survey, if sufficiently current to provide accurate information;
(b) the public records of the county assessor;
(c) the public records of the state engineer; and
(d) the public records of irrigation districts, acequias, water conservancy districts, and other water users’ associations or commissions.
(2) Any claimant who desires to participate in a stream system issue proceeding or an expedited inter se proceeding shall file with the court and serve on the plaintiff a notice of intent to participate within the time prescribed by the court. Thereafter, the court shall conduct such scheduling conferences, hearings, and other proceedings as necessary to resolve the issues.
D. Effect of proceeding. Stream adjudications are special proceedings to determine the rights to use the waters of a stream system. An order resolving a stream system issue proceeding or an expedited inter se proceeding binds all water rights claimants regardless of whether they were served and joined as defendants, participated in, or received actual notice of the proceeding, provided notice was given in accordance with Paragraph C of this rule.
End

Rule History

[Provisionally approved by Supreme Court Order No. 07-8300-013 for one year, effective June 13, 2007; provisionally approved by Supreme Court Order 08-8300 for one additional year, effective June 9, 2008; provisionally approved by Supreme Court Order No. 09-8300-015, for one additional year, effective June 9, 2009; provisionally approved by Supreme Court Order No. 10-8300-020, for one additional year, effective June 8, 2010; as amended by Supreme Court Order No. 11-8300-027, effective for new and pending cases on or after June 8, 2011.]

Plain-English Summary

This rule creates two procedures to resolve stream adjudications efficiently. A “stream system issue” is one whose resolution could directly affect the water rights of all or a significant number of claimants; any party may move (or the court may act on its own) to designate one, and after a hearing the court defines the scope, timing, and procedures, with notice to all claimants in the designated sections. An “expedited inter se proceeding” resolves a claim both between the plaintiff and the defendant and among the defendant and other claimants, and the court may order one where it promotes efficiency and expeditious completion.

Notice for either proceeding goes to all claimants—whether or not served and joined—by first-class mail to those reasonably ascertainable and by a method reasonably calculated to reach unknown claimants, drawing on hydrographic surveys, assessor, state engineer, and water-association records. An order resolving a stream system issue or expedited inter se proceeding binds all water rights claimants, even those who did not participate or receive actual notice, as long as notice was given as the rule requires.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a “stream system issue”?

An issue in a stream adjudication whose resolution could directly affect the water rights of all or a significant number of claimants; once designated, it is resolved with notice to all affected claimants.

Does the outcome bind claimants who did not participate?

Yes. An order resolving a stream system issue or expedited inter se proceeding binds all water rights claimants, even those who did not participate or get actual notice, provided notice was given as the rule requires.

Source & verification. Rule text and Committee commentary reproduced verbatim from the New Mexico Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts (Rule 1-071.2 NMRA), published by the New Mexico Compilation Commission (NMOneSource). Promulgated by the Supreme Court of New Mexico. The plain-English summary is original and draws on the official annotations. Last verified June 26, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: stream system issueexpedited inter se proceedingwater adjudication procedureinter se