Rule 12.Defenses and Objections—When and How Presented—by Pleading or Motion—Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
Last amended July 1, 1983 · Last verified July 1, 2026
Full Text of Rule 12
Amendment History
Effective Date: July 1, 1970
Amended: July 1, 1983
Plain-English Summary
Division (A) requires an answer within twenty-eight days after service of the summons and complaint, or twenty-eight days after service by publication is complete, with adjusted deadlines when a motion has been filed and denied or when the court orders an amended pleading. Division (B) lists seven defenses a party may raise by motion instead of by answer: lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, lack of jurisdiction over the person, improper venue, insufficiency of process, insufficiency of service of process, failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and failure to join a party under Rule 19 or 19.1. A motion asserting any of these must be made before pleading if a further pleading is allowed, and no defense is waived by being joined with others in the same motion.
Division (C) allows a motion for judgment on the pleadings once the pleadings are closed but before the motion would delay trial. Division (D) requires that motions to dismiss and motions for judgment on the pleadings be heard and decided before trial whenever any party asks. Division (E) lets a party move for a more definite statement when a pleading is so vague that a responsive pleading cannot reasonably be framed, and division (F) lets a court strike redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter from a pleading, on motion or on its own initiative.
Division (G) requires a party who moves under this rule to join every other available motion in the same filing. Division (H) then sets the waiver consequences: the defenses of personal jurisdiction, improper venue, insufficiency of process, and insufficiency of service of process are waived if omitted from an initial motion, or if not included in a responsive pleading or its permitted amendment when no motion is made. Failure to state a claim, failure to join a party under Rule 19, and an objection that a pleading fails to state a legal defense may be raised later — in a later pleading if one is allowed, in a motion for judgment on the pleadings, or at trial. Lack of subject matter jurisdiction can never be waived, and the court must dismiss the action whenever it appears, by any party’s suggestion or otherwise, that subject matter jurisdiction is lacking.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the seven defenses a defendant may raise by motion under Rule 12?
Lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, lack of jurisdiction over the person, improper venue, insufficiency of process, insufficiency of service of process, failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and failure to join a party under Rule 19 or 19.1.
Can a defendant lose the right to challenge personal jurisdiction or venue?
Yes. Rule 12(H) waives the defenses of personal jurisdiction, improper venue, insufficiency of process, and insufficiency of service of process if they are left out of an initial motion, or out of the answer when no motion is filed first.
Can a case be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any point in the case?
Yes. Rule 12(H)(3) makes lack of subject matter jurisdiction a defense that is never waived, and the court must dismiss the action whenever the lack of jurisdiction appears, even late in the case or on the court’s own initiative.