Rule 67.Judgments
Current through June 1, 2026 · Last verified July 11, 2026
Full Text of Rule 67
Amendment History
[CCP 12/13/80; §§ A, B, G amended by 2003 c.576 §§ 90 , 261, 568 eff. 1/1/04; § C amended by CCP 12/11/04 eff. 1/1/06; §§ C, D, E, F, G amended by CCP 12/6/14, eff. 1/1/2016.]
Plain-English Summary
Rule 67 opens with definitions: “judgment” carries the meaning given in ORS 18.005, and “order” covers any other court determination that is intermediate rather than final. From there, section C sets the baseline rule for every judgment — it has to grant the relief the winning party is entitled to, and a court cannot award relief different in kind from, or greater than, what the pleadings asked for unless the party who would be bound got reasonable notice and a chance to be heard first. Section B addresses cases with more than one claim (a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim) or more than one party: the court can enter a limited judgment covering some but not all of them, but only once the judge decides there is no just reason to delay entering it — a way to let a party collect on a resolved piece of the case without waiting on the rest.
The remaining sections cover specific judgment forms. In an action to recover personal property, judgment can order the property’s return, or its value if return is not possible, plus damages for the time it was wrongfully held, running in either direction depending on who prevails. A judgment against a partnership or unincorporated association sued in its own assumed or known name binds the joint property of its partners or associates, and a judgment against parties who are jointly indebted can be taken against fewer than all of them, without shutting the door on a later judgment for or against the rest in the same case. Parties can also enter judgment by stipulation at any point after the case begins — in writing, or announced in open court — and the stipulation can build in agreed attorney fees, costs, and disbursements. Finally, when a defendant admits a claim but asserts a smaller counterclaim against it, the court can enter a limited judgment on the undisputed excess right away, rather than making the plaintiff wait for the counterclaim to be resolved.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between a judgment and an order in Oregon?
Rule 67 A defines a judgment as having the meaning given in ORS 18.005, while an order is any other court determination that is intermediate in nature rather than final.
Can an Oregon court decide part of a case and let the rest continue?
Yes. Rule 67 B allows a limited judgment on one or more, but fewer than all, of the claims or parties in a case with multiple claims or parties, but only if the judge determines there is no just reason for delay.
Can a judgment award more than what the complaint asked for?
Only if the party against whom the judgment will be entered was given reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard on the different or greater relief, per Rule 67 C.
Can the parties just agree on a judgment instead of trying the case?
Yes. Rule 67 F allows judgment by stipulation, in a signed writing or by assent in open court, and the stipulation can include agreed attorney fees, costs, and disbursements as part of the judgment.
What happens to a judgment against a partnership sued under its business name?
Under Rule 67 E(1), the judgment may be entered against the partnership or association in that name and binds the joint property of all the partners or associates.