Rule 82.Security; Bonds and Undertakings; Justification of Sureties
Current through June 1, 2026 · Last verified July 11, 2026
Full Text of Rule 82
Amendment History
[CCP 12/13/80; § D amended by 1981 c.898 § 13; amended by 1991 c.331 § 2 ; § G amended by 1995 c.79 § 407 9/9/95; §§ A, B, C amended by 1997 c.631 §§ 561 , 562, 563; § E amended by 2003 c.194 § 17 eff. 1/1/04]
Plain-English Summary
Rule 82 is Oregon’s insurance policy for anyone stopped or dispossessed by a court order before a case is over. Before a restraining order or preliminary injunction can issue, before a receiver can take over property, and before a plaintiff can attach property or take it through claim and delivery, the party seeking the order has to post security — in an amount the court sets — to cover the other side’s costs, damages, and attorney fees if the order turns out to be wrongful. Two narrow exceptions excuse security for a restraining order or injunction: one sought to protect someone from violent or threatening behavior, and one that only holds a party to lawful conduct already available to them through the courts.
Security ordinarily takes the form of a bond from a qualified corporate surety or a letter of credit from an insured institution, though the court can waive, reduce, or limit that requirement, or accept a non-corporate surety or a deposit instead, on an ex parte showing of good cause. An individual can stand as surety only if the person lives in Oregon and — alone or together with any co-sureties — is worth at least twice the amount of the undertaking above exempt property and other debts; lawyers, peace officers, court clerks, and other court officers can’t serve as sureties. Every surety or letter-of-credit issuer submits to the court’s jurisdiction and can be held liable by motion, without a separate lawsuit.
A party who doubts a surety’s sufficiency has ten days after receiving a copy of the bond or letter of credit to object, or the objection’s waived. An objection triggers a hearing at which the surety has to appear and answer questions about its financial responsibility, after which the court can approve the bond, reject it, or demand a new one.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does Rule 82 require security before provisional process issues?
Because provisional process can restrain, dispossess, or otherwise burden a party before the case is decided, Rule 82 requires the party seeking it to post security in an amount the court sets, so there’s a fund to cover the other side’s costs, damages, and attorney fees if the order or process later turns out to have been wrongful.
Are there exceptions to the security requirement for a restraining order or injunction?
Yes. No security is required when the order is sought to protect a person from violent or threatening behavior, or when it only restricts the enjoined party to judicial remedies that were already available.
What form must security take under Rule 82?
Unless the court orders otherwise, security must be a bond issued by a corporate surety qualified to issue surety insurance, or a letter of credit issued by an insured institution.
Who’s qualified to serve as an individual surety in Oregon?
An individual surety must reside in Oregon. A single surety must be worth at least twice the amount specified in the undertaking, beyond exempt property and other debts; where there are several sureties, their combined net worth must reach that same threshold. Attorneys, peace officers, court clerks, and other court officers can’t serve as sureties.
How does a party object to a surety’s sufficiency?
Within ten days after receiving a copy of the bond or letter of credit, the party can serve a notice objecting to the sufficiency of the issuer or surety. Failing to serve that notice in time waives the objection.
Can a court reduce or waive the security Rule 82 otherwise requires?
Yes. On an ex parte showing of good cause, the court can waive, reduce, or limit any security or bond, authorize a non-corporate surety or a deposit instead of a bond, or require other security, on terms it considers just and equitable.
Is a bond always required before the sheriff takes property under Rule 85?
Not always. No bond or letter of credit is required before the sheriff takes property under Rule 85 if the court’s order authorizing provisional process finds probable cause that the defendant acquired the property contrary to law.