Rule 1035.3.Response. Judgment for Failure to Respond.
Adopted February 14, 1996 · Last amended May 16, 2003 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 1035.3
Plain-English Summary
This rule puts the burden on the non-moving party to come forward. The adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of its pleadings, but must file a response within thirty days after service of the motion, identifying one or more issues of fact from the record, or evidence establishing facts the motion says were not produced.
The rule offers relief and carries a penalty. An adverse party may supplement the record or explain why it cannot yet present essential evidence, and the court may rule or permit further discovery. Summary judgment may be entered against a party who does not respond, though the court may also rule on a motion without written responses where it states its reasons.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long do I have to respond to a summary-judgment motion?
Thirty days after service of the motion. The response must point to evidence of record creating a factual dispute or establishing the facts the motion claims were not produced.
What if I don’t respond to a summary-judgment motion?
Summary judgment may be entered against you for failing to respond.
Official Note
Official Note: If the moving party has supported the motion with oral testimony only, the response may raise the defense that there is a genuine issue of material fact because the cause of action is dependent upon the credibility and demeanor of the witnesses who will testify at trial. See Nanty-Glo v. American Surety Co., 309 Pa. 236, 163 A. 523 (1932); Penn Center House, Inc. v. Hoffman, 520 Pa. 171, 553 A.2d 900 (1989).
Official Note: Procedural requirements with respect to argument and briefs are governed by local rule. In certain counties, the failure to respond to a motion may result in the motion being deemed uncontested and the entry of the judgment sought. See Rule 1035.2 providing for the entry of judgment in whole or in part.
Official Note: Subdivision (e) does not abrogate the requirement that a motion for summary judgment be timely filed pursuant to Rule 1035.2 or case management order. If a motion is not timely filed, subdivision (e) provides the court with the discretion as to the manner of proceeding, including whether to consider the motion at all. The court should not consider the motion except in the interests of justice.
Amendment History
The provisions of this Rule 1035.3 adopted February 14, 1996, effective July 1, 1996, 26 Pa.B. 862; amended May 16, 2003, effective September 1, 2003, 33 Pa.B. 2587. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (212305) to (212306).