Rule 1042.7.Entry of Judgment of Non Pros for Failure to File Certification.
Adopted January 27, 2003 · Last amended June 16, 2008 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 1042.7
Plain-English Summary
This rule is the dismissal mechanism for a missing certificate of merit. On the defendant’s praecipe, the prothonotary enters a judgment of non pros against the plaintiff for failure to file a certificate within the required time.
Several conditions must be met. There must be no pending motion to determine that a certificate is unnecessary and no pending timely motion to extend the time; no certificate of merit may have been filed; the defendant must have served and attached a certificate of service of the notice of intention; and the praecipe must be filed no less than thirty days after that notice. The rule prescribes the form of praecipe.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is a malpractice case dismissed for failing to file a certificate of merit?
The defendant files a praecipe, and the prothonotary enters a judgment of non pros — but only after notice of intention was served and at least thirty days have passed, and only if no certificate was filed and no necessity or extension motion is pending.
Official Note
Official Note: The prothonotary may not enter judgment if the certificate of merit has been filed prior to the filing of the praecipe. Rule 237.1 does not apply to a judgment of non pros entered under this rule. See Rule 208.2(a)(4) for the content of the certificate of service.
Official Note: Where applicable, a certificate of service of the notice of intention to enter judgment of non pros shall be attached to the praecipe.
Amendment History
The provisions of this Rule 1042.7 adopted January 27, 2003, effective immediately, 33 Pa.B. 748; amended June 16, 2008, effective immediately, 38 Pa.B. 3481. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (316386) to (316387).