Rule 1083.Judgment in Rem for Property When Defendant is Not Served and Does Not Appear.
Adopted June 25, 1946 · Last amended April 12, 1999 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 1083
Plain-English Summary
Sometimes a defendant cannot be served and never shows up, yet the property has already been seized. This rule lets the plaintiff move, forty-five days after seizure, for a judgment in rem — a judgment against the property itself rather than the person — awarding the property to the plaintiff.
The waiting period gives an absent defendant a window to surface before the property is lost.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a plaintiff win the property if the defendant is never served?
Yes, by an in rem judgment, if the property was seized and forty-five days have passed since seizure.
Official Note
Official Note: If defendant has been served or appeared in the action, a default judgment may be entered for want of an answer.
Amendment History
The provisions of this Rule 1083 adopted June 25, 1946, effective January 1, 1947; amended June 23, 1975, effective October 1, 1975, 5 Pa.B. 1824; amended April 12, 1999, effective July 1, 1999, 29 Pa.B. 2266. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (212326).