RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 1901.5.Enforcement.

Adopted March 9, 1998 · Last amended May 2, 2006 · Last verified June 30, 2026

In one sentenceWhen someone is arrested for violating a protection order, a complaint for indirect criminal contempt is completed and signed by a police officer, the sheriff, or the plaintiff; if no arrest is made, the plaintiff may sign one.

Full Text of Rule 1901.5

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a) When an arrest is made for violation of an order, a complaint for indirect criminal contempt shall be completed and signed by either a police officer, the sheriff or the plaintiff. When the complaint is filed by a police officer or sheriff, neither the plaintiff’s presence nor signature is required.
(b) If an arrest is not effected, a complaint for indirect criminal contempt may be completed and signed by the plaintiff pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 6113.1.
End

Plain-English Summary

This rule sets how a protection order is enforced through the contempt process. When an arrest is made for violating an order, a complaint for indirect criminal contempt must be completed and signed by a police officer, the sheriff, or the plaintiff.

Where no arrest is effected, the plaintiff may complete and sign such a complaint under the Protection From Abuse Act. The Explanatory Comment notes the 2005 amendments expanding the sheriff’s role. The contempt complaint is the vehicle that turns a violation of the civil order into a proceeding that can punish the abuser.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if someone violates a protection order?

An arrest may be made and a complaint for indirect criminal contempt filed by a police officer, the sheriff, or the plaintiff.

Official Note

Explanatory Comment. —2006 The 2005 amendments to the Protection From Abuse Act authorize the sheriff to arrest the defendant for violations of a protection from abuse order. In addition, the sheriff is authorized to exercise a search and seizure of any firearm, other weapon and ammunition subsequent to arrest. 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 6113(a) and (b).

Amendment History

The provisions of this Rule 1901.5 adopted March 9, 1998, effective July 1, 1998, 28 Pa.B. 1391; amended May 2, 2006, effective May 9, 2006, 36 Pa.B. 2369. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (311799).

Source & verification. Rule text, the Official Note, and the amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Pennsylvania Code, Title 231, the official compilation of rules adopted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Last verified June 30, 2026. · Official text
Also known as: enforce protection orderindirect criminal contempt PFAviolation of PFA order