Rule 15.Amended and Supplemental Pleadings
Part III: Pleadings and Motions · Last amended 1969 · Last verified July 16, 2026
Full Text of Rule 15-6-15
Plain-English Summary
Rule 15-6-15 gives pleadings flexibility to change as a case develops. Subdivision (a) allows one amendment as a matter of course, without needing permission, before a responsive pleading is served, or, if no response is permitted and the case has not yet been set for trial, within twenty days after the pleading was served. Beyond that, a party needs leave of court or the other side’s written consent, and courts are directed to give that leave freely when justice requires it. A party responding to an amended pleading gets whichever is longer: the time remaining to respond to the original pleading, or ten days after the amendment was served.
Subdivision (b) deals with the gap between what the pleadings say and what gets litigated at trial. If the parties try an issue not raised in the pleadings, whether by express or implied consent, the rule treats it as if it had been pleaded all along, and the pleadings can be amended to match even after judgment, though failure to amend does not undo the trial of that issue. If a party objects that evidence falls outside the pleaded issues, the court may allow amendment anyway and should do so freely when it would serve the merits and the objecting party cannot show real prejudice, granting a continuance if needed to let that party respond to the new evidence.
Subdivision (c) lets an amendment relate back to the date of the original pleading when the new claim or defense arises from the same conduct, transaction, or occurrence already set out or attempted to be set out. An amendment that changes the party against whom a claim is asserted relates back the same way if, in addition, the new party received notice of the action in time to avoid prejudice to their defense and knew or should have known the action would have named them but for a mistake about identity. Subdivision (d) covers a different situation: supplemental pleadings addressing events that happened after the original pleading was filed, which the court may permit on reasonable notice and terms, even if the original pleading itself was defective.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I amend my complaint without asking the court’s permission?
Yes, once. Rule 15-6-15(a) allows one amendment as a matter of course before a responsive pleading is served, or within twenty days of service if no response is permitted and the case has not been set for trial. After that, amendment requires leave of court or the other party’s written consent.
What if the parties end up trying an issue at trial that wasn’t in the pleadings?
Rule 15-6-15(b) treats an issue tried by express or implied consent as if it had been raised in the pleadings, and the pleadings may be amended to conform to that evidence even after judgment, though failing to amend does not affect the result of the trial on that issue.
When does an amended pleading relate back to the date of the original pleading?
Rule 15-6-15(c) allows relation back when the amended claim or defense arises out of the same conduct, transaction, or occurrence already set out or attempted to be set out in the original pleading.
Can I amend my complaint to correct the name of the defendant I meant to sue?
Yes, under conditions. Rule 15-6-15(c) allows an amendment changing the party against whom a claim is asserted to relate back if the new party received timely notice that avoids prejudice and knew or should have known the action would have named them but for a mistake about identity.
What is a supplemental pleading and how is it different from an amended one?
Rule 15-6-15(d) describes a supplemental pleading as one that sets out transactions, occurrences, or events happening after the original pleading was filed. The court may permit it on reasonable notice and terms, even if the original pleading was itself defective.