Rule 299a.Findings of Fact to Be Separately Sent and Not Recited in a Judgment
Last amended May 28, 2024 · Last verified June 28, 2026
Full Text of Rule 299a
Notes and Comments
Comment to 1990 change: To require that findings of fact be separate from the judgment and that such separate findings of fact are controlling on appeal.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 299a keeps findings out of the judgment itself. Findings of fact must not be recited in a judgment; they must be sent as a document separate from it. If a finding recited in a judgment conflicts with a finding made separately under Rules 297 and 298, the separately made finding controls for appellate purposes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can findings of fact be written into the judgment in Texas?
No. Rule 299a requires findings of fact to be sent separately from the judgment, and a separately made finding controls over any conflicting finding recited in the judgment.
Which findings win if a Texas judgment and a later finding disagree?
The findings made under Rules 297 and 298 win. Rule 299a says that when they conflict with findings recited in the judgment, the separately made findings govern for appellate purposes.
Must Texas findings of fact be their own document, apart from the judgment?
Yes. Rule 299a requires the findings to be sent as one or more documents apart from the judgment itself, not folded into it.