Rule 307.Exceptions, Etc., Transcript
Last verified June 28, 2026
Full Text of Rule 307
Plain-English Summary
Rule 307 offers a narrow appellate shortcut. In a nonjury case where findings of fact and conclusions of law are requested and filed, and in a jury case where a special verdict is returned, a party may argue that those findings or that verdict do not support the judgment. To preserve the complaint, the party has an exception to the judgment noted in the record.
The payoff is a lighter record. The party may then appeal — or bring a writ of error where one is allowed — without a statement of facts or further exceptions in the transcript. The transcript still must contain the conclusions of law and fact or the special verdict, along with the judgment rendered on them.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does Rule 307 let you appeal without a statement of facts?
When findings or a special verdict are on file, Rule 307 lets you appeal the claim that they do not support the judgment using just the findings or verdict and the judgment, after noting an exception.
Does Rule 307 apply if the court never filed findings of fact?
No. Rule 307 applies only when findings of fact and conclusions of law were requested and filed in a non-jury case, or when the jury returned a special verdict in a jury case. Without one of those on file, the rule's shortened record does not apply.
What must the transcript include when you appeal under Rule 307?
The transcript must still contain the conclusions of law and fact, or the special verdict, and the judgment rendered on them. Rule 307 excuses the statement of facts and further exceptions, not those core documents.